Will we know why had universe began, why there is something instead of nothing.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    The difference between “how” and “why” doesn’t seem very meaningful to me. For example- why does water boil? It boils because molecules gain enough energy through heat to transition states.

    In that same sense, OP’s question

    why there is something instead of nothing.?

    There’s a non zero chance that we eventually understand the mechanisms behind the big bang and can explain how nothing turned into something. Therefore we will be able to explain the why, no?

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem with the question of why is that you can always ask why again. Say we do understand the mechanism of the big bang. You can still ask “why” about why things are that way. Which is why in my view that’s still more of a “how?” “Why” is more of a question for philosophers than scientists imo.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But is that not the same way with “how”?

        How do objects fall to the ground? → the Earth exerts a gravitational force on them

        How does Earth exert a gravitational force? → All objects with mass create a gravitational field that attracts other masses

        How do objects create a gravitation field? → Mass warps spacetime and this curvature directs objects to follow paths towards the source of the mass

        and so on, etc

        • tronx4002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think the “why” exists only with the idea that the universe is directed in some way. e.g. “How can I see around my room”? Photons. “Why”? Because I turned on the light.