• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That depends on whether the virus starts spreading human-to-human with each infected person infecting more than one other person.

    If it does not, then things look like the SARS outbreak in 2002-2004, where a few people get sick, and a few people die.

    If it starts spreading with R₀ > 1, then pretty much everybody gets it, and a significant number die.

    We could reduce the risk of the latter with measures like:

    • Actively test all dairy herds
    • Vaccinate dairy workers, and regularly test them for infection
    • Quarantine those who are infected
    • Ban the sale of unpasteurized milk and crack down on existing black-market distribution of it

    However, it seems really unlikely that we’ll actually do so.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago
      • Ban the sale of unpasteurized milk and crack down on existing black-market distribution of it

      RFK jr will help out here, right?

      /s

      • Brumefey@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m’ from Europe and drink fresh milk daily, eat Camembert and other unpasteurised cheeses, and raw meat (filet américain), never had any issue. Of course it’s not for young children and pregnant women… do you Americans see this the same way we consider drinking tap water in India ?

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What part of Europe? Is you food coming from a very long input chain with many inputs? The chances of contamination increases with each input source and every additional step in the delivery process.

    • sudoaptupgrade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      OP, you seem smart.

      I am a low income person on the verge of moving because my finances are so bad. I was considering moving to a place with a shared bathrooms and over 10 people living in the building. The deposit on the place so far is a trivial amount and I can abandon the lease without significant consequence. I work remotely.

      I am trying not to be irrationally concerned by click bate, but also would prefer not to die as a result of bird flu during the next year if that’s a possibility. I’m not sure if this is a “when not if” situation or if the new media and government keep bringing this up but realistically the chances are low. I am generally good at parsing out bullshit from genuine data, but am at a loss with this one.

      Do you think it would be a mistake to move into this new place? I am already feeling reluctant because it’s in a less urban area and I don’t really like critters. I could abandon it and try to get a cheap place in a different area with my own bathroom. Please let me know if you happen to see this what you think.

      Assume that I find 30 percent risk of bird flu spreading in the next year with a R value greater than 1 to be the point at which I abandon this move.

      I have also even considered things like just leasing a car, living in it, and trying to head as far north as possible, find some place to rent in the middle of nowhere or make a campsite and start hoarding food somehow. (This would involve more critters, unfortunately, but they likely don’t pose an existentialist threat.) If everyone is going to get this bird flu thing and many die, it seems like severe isolation may be the best way to survive.

      Please help.