https://lemmy.world/comment/14391879

Please no brigading, I’m only linking for context.

Criticising the OP for being spiteful by saying “Served them right!” in the post when lack of customers resulted in menu changes, which still failed to save the restaurant is hardly “excusing carnism” or being a “fake vegan” in my opinion.

“fake vegan” isn’t in the rules anywhere either? Odd really.

Failing to celebrate the closure of a (formerly) vegan restaurant due to lack of customers hardly sounds like ‘carnist rhetoric’ (rule 5) to me but what do I know.

  • rbn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s indeed exactly the same comments. I was banned along with you and posted it back then. In the other thread also Sunshine (the mod) responded but doubled down on her decision.

    I find it very unfortunate that !vegan@lemmy.world apparantly doesn’t allow for debates but I guess that’s in the end the decision of the mods.