Summary

Under the UK’s Online Safety Act, all websites hosting pornography, including social media platforms, must implement “robust” age verification methods, such as photo ID or credit card checks, for UK users by July.

Regulator Ofcom claims this is to prevent children from accessing explicit content, as research shows many are exposed as young as nine.

Critics, including privacy groups and porn sites, warn the measures could drive users to less-regulated parts of the internet, raising safety and privacy concerns.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thinking about this recently. Kids tend to find ways to abuse the technology for “naughty” purposes whatever the era. I remember the first kid I knew with residential internet back in the early 90s, the very first thing he wanted to show off about it was that you could get on some ancient bulletin board system and if you waited like 7 minutes you could eventually see a whole picture of a topless woman.

    Trying to age gate all internet smut sounds like a losing battle. I think an unintended consequence might be young people hassling their peers for nudes at a higher rate. Either that or they will find alternative modes of distribution that adults didn’t even think about.

    Maybe instead of trying to deanonymize internet usage for literally everybody, there is an actual social solution such as, oh, I dunno, parenting?

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      you’re not wrong, but as the parent of a 7 year old, i find it impossible to keep them from things i didn’t want them to absorb, because even one child at school can undo all the safeguards I’ve implemented at home. putting it all down to “parenting” is not the solution either.

      • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I actually agree with you, in that I’ve been where you are and it is extremely difficult. There has been more pushback recently against the idea that very young kids are magically entitled to unfettered device access. The incentives are misaligned because big tech just wants more and more pairs of eyes. They don’t really care about the underlying harms. However they have built better parental controls recently. I have to credit Apple (extremely reluctantly) because their controls and reporting seem to be better.

        However you are right, there will always be some other kid at school with a completely unlocked device because his parents are idiots and pay zero attention.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Remember when the Snowden revelations came out?

    Not only it showed that the UK was even more intrusive in their surveillance of their own citiziens than the US, but after those revelations, whilst the US walked back on some of the surveillance, the Government of the UK simply retroactivelly legalized all of it, the editor at The Guardian who published the Snowden revelations got kicked out and the entire British Press went quiet about it since then.

    The chances of this being genuinelly about protecting children rather than about facilitating the identification of British internet users by the GCHQ, are pretty much zero.

    Personally I lived in the UK back when the Snowden revelations came out, so switched to being behind an always on VPN and since then never lost that habit. (And yeah, it’s of course not a foolproof mechanism, but it sure makes it way harder to be caught in the broad trawling done by the surveillance apparatus, plus it’s also pretty useful for “sailing the high seas”)

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Right? You can’t stop the porn and these barriers is only to create an artificial market.

      But whatever. The more people become anonymous on the internet, the better.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    We’re really globally going to return to the pre-WWII status quo, aren’t we?

    The past 50+ years were an anomaly in humanity’s development, but we all collectively fell for the idea that it was, and would remain, the norm.

    How wrong we were.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly I never understood this. I grew up with the internet so I’ve always had access to porn from a young age (If anything it was even easier back than). And pretty much everyone that’s 35 years or younger did as well and I’d say generally we all turned out fine. At least not any worse off than any other generation. And honestly the only negative side effect it had on me was having unrealistic expectations the first time I actually had sex.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        Dude same. I fucked up a lot of potential relationships when I was younger because I expected it to “be like the movies.”

    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      It makes a lot more sense when you look at it in context, particularly in regards to trans and all LGBTQ+ people. These transphobic governments consider simply existing as trans to be pornographic, so they are trying to block access to educational information on us, while also compiling a list of anyone who does. It’s the exact same shit America is trying to do with KOSA

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      And honestly the only negative side effect it had on me was having unrealistic expectations the first time I actually had sex.

      And that is what we should be worrying about.

      I told my kid that she can watch all the porn she wants, I don’t care. Just don’t expect actual sex to be like that.

    • Yprum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, and actually I would say with confidence we are actually better off. It’s true that unrealistic expectations is a big issue (well, might be more like, I think most realize that porn is not real after experiencing it so it’s not a big problem really for most), but at least we do have a good understanding of the possibilities and what is safe and what is not… At the very least we have a more openminded and informed point of view on sex and relationships. Which doesn’t mean either “let’s show porn to the kids” of course, but it’s such an overblown topic in society.

      Let parents be the responsible ones of what kids watch, not the webpages…

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Every once in a while I hear boomers waxing poetic about the wholesome days of old nudie mags.

      Well, I happen know the boomer’s own parents were plenty outraged by them, actually. And, have you ever read one of those? The copy is pretty damn disrespectful about the women appearing therein, as were the men running the show.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Luckily kids don’t know about VPN’s otherwise this entire sharade would be completely usele…

    Edit: I think this isn’t enough though. Politicians should be forced to have a public porn history so you can vote by their porn preference. I wouldn’t trust a politician who isn’t into some weird kink stuff. Vanilla people are boring and shouldn’t run a country.

  • Luckiesock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay chief. How bout you verify the ID’S of UK politicians who visit Asia for kids?

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I thought this was a USAmerican headline, but it’s the UK 🤣 There will be another spike in VPN purchases, won’t there? (Probably Proton VPN if people haven’t read about their pro-MAGA stance).

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Germany had these kinds of laws since before the internet, that is, “are you 18?” questions simply weren’t judged adequate to fulfil the pre-existing requirements.

      Net result is that there’s no German porn sites, and the big search engines filter their results. Which doesn’t mean that you can’t get porn everywhere, it just means that kids are learning a particular subset of the English lexicon quite early once they seek it out which is perfectly fine under German law as with anything youth protection it’s not supposed to stop determined kids, once they’re determined they’re individually old enough, it’s supposed to limit casual exposure.

      The distinction Germany makes is “targeted at a German market/audience”. So if your domain isn’t on .de, if your payment options aren’t Germany-specific, ideally if you don’t even have a German UI translation, none of that stuff applies to you. Authorities will just ignore you.

      Unless the UK is going down the Saudi route of blocking foreign sites, the exact same thing will happen. There’s always going to be some jurisdiction with lax youth protection laws where porn sites can set up their legal headquarters.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The UK trots out legislation like this every few years.
      So far, it’s not gone through.
      However, to paraphrase a parasomething, “You have to defeat the proposal every time, we just have to make it law once”

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      UK may be taking a slightly different path, but we’ll both end up in the same shithole at the end. Incredible.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Back when the Snowden revelations came out the UK was worse than the US when it came to civil society surveillance and unlike the US, the Government there just retroactivelly legalized all that their NSA-equivalent (the GCHQ) did with no restrictions.

        Oh, and the UK Press has a censorship mechanism called D-Notices.

        In this domain the UK is already worse than the US, probably because the idea that the populus should know their place and be led by “their betters” is pretty old in Britain and, at least for the elites, the thinking about the relation between power and the people never significativelly evolved away from the original thinking in Absolute Monarchies, since the political and power structures there are still anchored on a Monarchy.

  • LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    I expect this to go just as well as for the US states that implemented similar laws. So basically anyone in the UK is blocked access and will just have to use a VPN for porn. Any kind of recording of IDs is obviously a huge security risk for everyone involved, and it doesn’t really make sense for porn sites to open themselves for that.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    so…why the sudden pressure to track porn usage to IDs?

    ohhh…the homosexuals.

    this is good news. it means they don’t already have a database of all the lgbtq+ communities.

    I wonder if there’s any crime committed if you sign up your local conservative politician for gay porn or monthly dildos. maybe even abortion drugs while you’re at it.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Majority of people are like that Hank Hill meme about jpegs, they don’t know what the hell a VPN is.