• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Stalin is a conflicting historical figure, who is neither a monster nor a savior, and so the way you describe him would differ depending on the angle of the conversation.

    If the talking point is the rights of the LGBT+ people (or, really, people’s rights overall sometimes), there’s no excuse for him there, and I’m pretty sure Hexbear is not quite the place for a homophobic rhetoric.

    But they may point out in other terms that under Stalin’s rule the economy got insanely boosted, the WW2 was won, and many megaprojects used to this day were constructed.

    • chandlerbung@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No he’s a monster. You don’t stop being a monster because you also did good alongside the evil.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Being lucky oil prices went up (same for Putin) and people thinking it’s your magic leadership lol.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The oil prices boomed around WW2, while the highest wave of economic growth in the Soviet Union was in the 30’s.

        It is Khrushchev and following leaders that benefitted from oil

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You can’t say the same things about Churchill, there was no massive equalisation of wages in England during his rule, nor a planned economy guaranteeing a job to anyone who wanted a job, nor a collectivisation of agriculture and of the means of production, nor a state-backing of unions, nor an immense push towards literacy and women’s rights and education…

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Equalisation of wages in the USSR: Lets lower all wages to the lowest of them all and introduce corruption as an obligation to survive!

          Handy tool against dissidents too, corruption.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Regarding corruption, I made a little writeup a while ago about why corruption is systematically overestimated in the USSR which, if you’re arguing from good faith, you won’t have a problem checking out. There was active fight against corruption in the Soviet Union (as you can see by the sign on the picture), the so-called “chistka”, i.e. purges of party members, were part of said campaigns, and citizens could legally organise committees to review the functioning and accounting of local public services and institutions.

            Regarding “lowering wages”, you’re simply wrong. That’s just from the 60s, but material wealth of people rose at unparalleled speed in the USSR, faster than any country before that. And when the USSR economy stagnated in the 70s, real median wages kept rising at around 3.5% yearly

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Ha ha ha corruption was baked in the system, ask anyone who actually lived there and don’t get your information from facebook or lemmy ml.

              I wonder why you push so hard for this revisionism, it was just a brutal dictatorship, wages went up under Hitler too lol.

              • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                I sourced my information, you can do the same instead of disregarding it because it doesn’t match your ahistorical, uneducated, vibes-based conception of history.

                Also, regarding “asking people who lived there”, old people from ex-soviet republics consistently rank their previous socialist republics better on average than the modern counterparts…

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And those two things you mentioned have nothing to do with his political alignment

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Stalin is a conflicting historical figure, who is neither a monster nor a savior

      His one and only redeeming deed was that he finally, eventually, only after being stabbed in the back by his former ally Hitler, fought against him by throwing millions of russians at them and thanks to US support managed barely to win.

      In every other way he was a total monster, directly responsible for an amazing amount of human suffering that still lingers today in modern day Russia. If Communism had something good in it, Stalin personally ruined it for pretty much everyone for a long time.