• Mitsu@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I drank pods and drip for years before ordering a pourover thingy. The first time I tried nice, freshly ground pourover it was like I was drinking coffee for the first time. The taste is sooooo much better! I’ve also done French press, but pourover is easier to clean. I like pourover better than anything else.

      I can’t drink coffee anymore—caffeine ruins my body and makes me think I’m dying. But I miss it so!

    • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In my experience, pod machine coffee (specifically Keurig) tastes way worse than auto drip machine coffee, which is worse than the best coffee that you can make via manual pour over.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        How does the coffee compare to espresso though?

        I’m not a connoisseur so genuinely asking.

        I don’t have a pod machine. I grind coffee by hand and use an espresso machine.

        My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you need the pressure to “crack” the ground coffee and get the good stuff out.

        Edit: it’s ok people I get it.

        • colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’d say that it’s almost completely different. With pour over you’re getting a longer drink, very different texture (in general a clean cup, varies a bit depending on pour over style) and with good quality light roasted coffee beans a ton of flavor and tasting notes.

          you need the pressure to “crack”

          I’ve never heard this (which doesn’t mean much) - my understanding is that pressure is simply another form of extraction.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Another point in pour over vs espresso is flavor profile. You get totally different notes and zero bitterness from pour over.

          The key with pour over is controlling how much water and how long it “brews” to prevent over extraction.

          If you have a grinder I’d recommend getting a basic pour over and a gooseneck kettle. Electric ones are fantastic for tea, pour over coffee, moka pot coffee, french press and more.

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          A well made pour over will be every bit as “good” as a well made espresso. It’s also way less demanding in terms of equipment and technique.

          Making an espresso on par with the best coffee shops requires a great deal of skill/experience and thousands of dollars in equipment. If you don’t have the skill or equipment, straight espresso is usually pretty disgusting.

          You can make a phenomenal pour over with a YouTube video and $150 in gear.

          However, they’re different styles of drinks. A pour over is much less concentrated and doesn’t have the crema/body of espresso.

    • ytorf@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s surprisingly easy to make (but with a ton of room for finesse I am learning). You do need a coffee grinder to take advantage of maximum bean freshness, though, but taste difference is huge

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Taste difference compared to what though?

        Obviously real coffee is better than instant, but pressurised extraction (espresso) always seems a lot more flavourful than say a french press.

        • ytorf@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Compared to machine drip for sure, but it can pull out a lot of different flavors than you’d get from espresso (whether you want those flavors is another issue). My friend turned me on to the 4:6 method if you’re curious about methodology. I wouldn’t argue that it’s better or worse than espresso or drip (okay maybe drip 😂) but it’s giving me the flavors I want out of coffee right now.

        • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          French press is an immersion brewing method, also typically unfiltered. It produces a mellower, more full-bodied brew. Pour-over is a percolation brewing method, typically filtered. It produces stronger, clearer flavors with less body. Both are excellent, cheap alternatives to using an auto drip machine and will absolutely produce better coffee than most pod machines. Which brew method is better depends on personal preferences.

        • ytorf@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          For old man reasons: coffee oils can raise cholesterol in some people and using a paper filter lowers the oil levels

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I’m somewhat incredulous. I don’t mean that in a “you’re totally wrong you idiot” kind of way, just that I’m surprised I haven’t heard it before. I’m a cardio patient and drink too much coffee all day long.

            • kadup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              They’re correct, but also exaggerating it. If you ask somebody to brew you a cup using a french press, and using the same ground coffee, a batch of a pour over, you’ll notice some oils floating on the french press cup and not the pour over. So indeed, the paper filter will remove lipids from the brew. But are those in a quantity that could “raise cholesterol in some people”? Absolutely not, you’d have to be chugging coffee like a monster and even then, the tablespoon of butter you use in your toast is a much bigger concern.

              • ytorf@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I am definitely not an expert and probably a poster child for “a little knowledge is a dangerous thing” but after hearing about cafestol and kahweol and reading articles like this, I figured better safe than sorry since I tend toward borderline high.