The per 100g price makes it seem like the 1kg (bottom) item is cheaper than the 2kg one.

I wonder how many people are baited into getting the more expensive item (by weight).

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Top one is 2kg (single unit) and the bottom is sold as a 1 kg single unit, or 2 / $12 (2 x 1kg), which is STILL not a better value than the top one! LOL

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It very well could be typical corporate fuckery, but that makes me wonder if it’s actually a bug and that it’s computing the per kg price based on the single until price but dividing by the total weight of the pack.

      Or perhaps it’s a “bug” that’s left intentionally until called out.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If it’s a “bug” that they are actively profiting from, likely for years, it’s probably a feature! LOL