cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24607393

credit for this post to :
@denimaww@lemmy.world

The US is actually going to implement a nationwide abortion ban and the measures for how it’s going to be handled are already in the works. This bill, which I link to here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/7/text , seems ok at first glance and only seems to want to implement nationwide healthcare centers for women. But when you actually look at what these Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers are and mean to offer, it becomes really clear what’s going on.

On the first page of the PDF or booklet that appear when you search for the healthcare centers it is clear that they are supported by pro-life organisations and hold extreme pro-life values. And when you read the (very short) booklet it states their values and services that are to be provided. Among them is a requirement for “Abortion Pill Reversal” and encouragement for “Sterilization Reversal”. The last page clearly states their values, where among them it states that:

“Abortion is not women’s healthcare, because of the damage it causes to women’s physical and emotional health and the destruction of unborn life, many of whom are females. Abortion is usually something women turn to when they feel they do not have another choice. This is a tragedy and the opposite of choice and empowerment.”

And it goes on to list similiar values. The bill to implement these healthcare centers states that:

"That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses its support for women nationwide to have access to comprehensive, convenient, compassionate, life-affirming, high-quality health care; and

(2) recognizes the high standards established by Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers consortium as standards worth implementing nationwide."

This means that the values that these Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers have are to be set as standards nationwide.

A link to the PDF/booklet about the Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers (PWHC): https://nacn-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/PWHC-Booklet.pdf

  • diverging@lemm.eeEnglish
    62·
    15 hours ago

    According to four people who regularly talk to Biden, all of whom asked for anonymity to discuss internal campaign matters, it is virtually inconceivable that he will run for reelection in 2024, when he would be the first octogenarian president.

    Anonymous sources offering their personal opinion are not Biden.

    “No, I never have,” Biden said when asked by a reporter on Wednesday if those discussions were taking place. “I don’t have any plans on one term.”

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      39·
      14 hours ago

      That’s why numerous liberal media sources reported otherwise? The people who suck the democrat party’s dick for a living?

      Nah. When he ran in 2020 he made it seem like he’d be one term. He’s playing both sides. I can’t believe you fall for his fucking lies.

      Edit: he promised to be a “bridge candidate” to younger candidates, implying a one term presidency which he then pretended he didn’t say. I feel like I live in the fucking twilight zone being gaslit by blue MAGA twats.

      • diverging@lemm.eeEnglish
        34·
        14 hours ago

        When he ran in 2020 he made it seem like he’d be one term.

        How did you get that when he explicitly said he had no plans on one term?

        I can’t believe you fall for his fucking lies.

        What lies am I falling for? I always thought he would run for a second term, and then he did. You are the one that fell for the lies, thinking that he wouldn’t run again.

        Edit: The bridge candidate stuff is just fluff to get people to not worry about his age, it doesn’t mean anything. It is certainly not a promise of anything.

        • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          42·
          14 hours ago

          Edit: The bridge candidate stuff is just fluff to get people to not worry about his age, it doesn’t mean anything. It is certainly not a promise of anything.

          BULLSHIT. It was clearly implied he’d be a one term candidate. His own fucking words which he took back when convenient because he’s a fucking narcissist. All the liberal media saying it. All the “Biden campaign sources” saying it.

          Stop fucking gaslighting it’s embarrassing.

          • diverging@lemm.eeEnglish
            34·
            13 hours ago

            All the “Biden campaign sources” saying it.

            Several anonymous sources said that they thought that he would not run again. Why do you believe anonymous sources opinions?

            Is Biden not a “Biden campaign source”? Because he explicitly said he had no intention of running only one term.

            And why have you abandoned your original claim of a Biden promise?

            • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              2·
              6 hours ago

              His own words implied a one term presidency! All his campaign staff and media were saying so! Stop fucking gaslighting it’s fucking embarrassing. Liberals using pretzel logic to excuse a fucking genociding liar. Pathetic. Do fucking better. Stop simping for horrible people.

              Biden will be remembered as one of the worst presidents in history for good fucking reason. He was an atrocious failure and did nothing not a goddamn fucking thing to stop fascism.

              15 day old account where every comment is biden cope? Go back to bluesky DNC shill. Blocked.

              • diverging@lemm.eeEnglish
                1·
                5 hours ago

                His own words implied a one term presidency!

                The only words we have of his about a one term presidency say he had no such plans.

                All his campaign staff and media were saying so!

                Four anonymous people offered their personal opinion. They did not quote Biden.

                15 day old account

                I was on lemmy.world. It kept getting worse so I left. And I have never been all that active.