Great history lesson on how we got rid the unfair partisan district drawing.

I can’t wait for the future article titled: How Canada ended first-past-the-post

  • FlareHeart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    -Looks around at Saskatchewan where the (smaller) rural vote is given more seats than the more populated cities-

    Wut?

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Eventually, in 1955, one province — Manitoba — decided to experiment, and handed over the redistricting process to an independent commission. Its members were the province’s chief justice, its chief electoral officer, and the University of Manitoba president. The new policy became popular, and within a decade, it was backed by both major national parties, and signed into law.

    The trick is to appoint nonpartisan commissioners…

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The trick is to FIND non-partisan commissioners. That may be hard in America where “count every vote” is somehow partisan.

  • MNByChoice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I am disappointed. It seems “Mounties” is used to mean Canadians, and not the actual Mounties.

    Otherwise a good overview and background for a USA Supreme Court case.

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It seems “Mounties” is used to mean Canadians, and not the actual Mounties.

      Keep up misusing that word and we’ll start Mountie’ing your mom.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Mounties” is used to mean Canadians, and not the actual Mounties

      That’s dumb. I don’t know everyone, but I also know no one who’d refer to anyone other than our nationwide cops as “mounties”.