• teri@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I support the cause in general but: Signal is not federated at all. It may seem like a decent alternative to WhatsApp but is it really? It still falls under the same US jurisdiction. Let’s say the US gov starts agressively prosecuting dissidents and certain minorities (they already do): can and should we still use signal in this case? I don’t think so. Sadly i can’t name a much better alternative. Maybe matrix. But it has other issues.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Are any of these actually good?

    I mean, aside from Lemmy. I tried Mastadon and no one was actually on it, seems like everyone is jumping to Bluesky.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    instead of switching ive mostly just been ditching entirely. I need less time interacting with internet people.

    literally the only thing on this list im still using is facebook messenger, for my work colleagues. and youtube. everything else ive migrated (reddit-lemmy), or abandoned and torched

  • RedSnt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I was already on Mastodon by just having a Vivaldi (the chromium browser) account, and it’s just lovely I’ve spent most of the day setting up lemmy, even though I joined feddit.dk 2 years ago, it’s only just now I’m taking it seriously.
    And, while not related to the fediverse per se, I switched to linux a year ago.
    The only service that’s hard to drop/switch away from is Youtube imo.

  • breadcat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I keep seeing this type stuff but neither peertube or friendica are genuine replacements at this point, mastodon is weaksauce compared to akkoma or a misskey fork, and loops is alpha software. also yes signal is centralized but it just works and has contact discovery so it owns matrix and xmpp when compared to whatsapp. basically none of this stuff is truly ready

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Friendica seems like a new thing? No apps for that yet either

    • Esmoreit@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Loops will be open sourced later they say.

      Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

        I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Sometimes you’re ashamed of the ugly hacks you cobbled together to reach MVP, and you want to fix the stuff you know you need to fix first before being thrown to the wolves. I can respect that, for a limited time.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

      • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I was told that unless you self host, matrix is less secure because it leaks more metadata. Something to consider

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            sender, recipient, chatroom, what kind of event you sent (message, emoji, reaction, vote), if you responded to a message, room privilege changes, etc

            but it’s a question how big of a problem is that. they want to tackle it in the future, but that’s far away for now I think

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Switching from WhatsApp to any other messaging service isn’t a realistic option for quite many places. I’d be more than willing to switch but of all the people in my contacts (including my entire customer base) there’s like 3 people using Signal but every single one of them has WhatsApp. Even the 60+ year olds.

    • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I would say it’s a step by step work. I have moved my family from Whatsapp to Signal years ago and then to Matrix. I forced them in some way but I just said “sorry if you want to keep contact we will have to find another app, I don’t accept Whatsapp ToS.” It took some time but my close family and friends are there and I regularly get someone to join, friend or family. It’s still close circle but it’s also a good thing. Same went with work. Colleagues wanted to do a whatsapp group for a project and I basically said “No, best I can do is Signal.” and they went with it.

    • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Same (Brazil), Whatsapp is pretty much a requirement and I hate that I’m forced to give Meta my information by using their shitty app.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That’s Lemmy in a nutshell. Guillotine and Luigi memes are constantly repeated because they know that no one’s actually going to act on that stuff, but any time anyone suggests a practical means to weaken the oligopoly people come out of the woodwork to shut it down.

            • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You think? I consider these memes more like a reminder of our global to-do list. It doesn’t mean we can’t selfhost a matrix server at the same time.

    • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My trouble as well, I’d love to switch from Whatsapp, but literally every person I talk to and most people in my city/estate/country uses It.

      There’s a “vendor lock” term, maybe this would be a “social lock”?

          • pfr@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            There benefit would be exactly what this top comment is about. For all those people in your contacts who don’t use signal, you could still use signal to message them, it would just be an SMS message. It would therefore also become more enticing for people to switch from their stock SMS app to signal, because it would make no difference in terms of who you can send SMS messages to. It would allow for the signal user base to grow, solving the issue of “no one uses signal”

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        At least WhatsApp is encrypted and let you have propre group chat

              • pseudo@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I did not say it was secure, I actually spend a lot of time explaining to people that it is secure and they should switch to Signal. However, I will not tell them to go back to SMS for the reason aforementioned.

              • pfr@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                You still pay for SMS? Wtf, what country do you live in? Most postpaid mobile plans these days only charge for data usage. In which case, your still paying to use WhatsApp.

                • teohhanhui@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Are you from the global south? Because it’s still a common thing for SMS to be chargeable in many countries. And no one should be using SMS anyway. It’s horribly insecure. At least use RCS.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Youtube is probably the one that you can’t “Just Switch To Fediverse”

    Youtube content is mainly by creators. If they won’t leave, there will be no transition. And unlike reddit posts, you can’t just reupload. Because they will copyright strike you and take it down. Also, videos take up a lot more space than just text and some low-res memes like reddit-type sites.

    reddit is essentially a bunch of strangers talking to people, moving froms stranger Group A to stranger Group B is very easy to do. The reddit > Lemmy transition is probably one of the easiest. You’re just joining a new group of strangers.

    For everything else, your contacts will also need to switch.

    For Mastodon, the people you follow will also need to switch. This is even harder than getting your friends to switch.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 minutes ago

      Remember the early days of YouTube? When people made garage videos for fun? Remember Vines? When people were making videos instead of businesses making content?

      That’s what Peertube is for. It’s to have fun. Showcase your high school band. Talk about your potted plants. Share your excitement about trains. It’s not to make money. It’s to live.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      For Mastodon, the people you follow will also need to switch. This is even harder than getting your friends to switch.

      Well I switched from the birdsite to Mastodon because a) I like to shout in the void and b) see what other people are shouting into the void. Doesn’t really ultimately matter who’s doing the shouting. People who go to social media exclusively for news and updates are a bit strange when you really think about it. You’ve got to have the shout in you.

      (I’m only being half facetious here)

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Hear me out.

      Creators should be hosting peer tubes. And they should host exclusively their own content. Fans of their can subscribe to whatever systems they want to pay and support.

      For creators, it’s a backup for when YouTube the project inevitably fails. For fans as well. But it’s also a backup of their content.

      • Statick@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Tech-savvy content creators, sure…

        Your average content creator that wants to make Minecraft videos? Unrealistic.

        I hate the monopoly Youtube has, but all of the federated alternatives have a learning curve the general public isn’t willing to deal with.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Not to mention it lacks any (ethical) monetization options. And the app is absolutely rudimentary, lacking even basic functionality.

          Framasoft made it clear they don’t want to make it a Youtube alternative though, however it could be through plugins. So there’d have to be a company or cooperative using it as a base to build upon, which is actually realistic. Especially European ones; not because Asia wouldn’t be interested in being more independent on the US as well, but because Framasoft is from France and Europe actively works towards this goal anyway with lots of money behind it.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      A lot of youtubers make a living posting videos.

      They dont have a good enough reason to risk going to a much smaller audience with no ads and no membership system

      They also probably arent knowledgeable enough about computers to switch

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        You don’t need to have a YouTube login to watch those. But you can join Peertube to post your content that you make without money as an end goal.

    • jonjuan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You also can’t just switch from whatsapp to signal. I have hundreds of contacts on whatsapp that message me constantly there, and 2 on signal.