While US propaganda about China is definitely a thing, there is substantial videographic evidence of this event, well before the likes of picture-realistic graphics for video.
US propaganda existing, and the fact that some realities of Chinese history are grim are not mutually exclusive concepts.
I for one am a strong proponent of China being successful, I just hope they can reckon with their past instead of suppressing any mention of the “incident”.
True socialism involves the workers actually holding the levers of power directly or via representatives actually beholden to them. How can this be the case where political discussion is only tolerated on small scale and immediately shut-down if it gains any wider traction?
If they just states the facts, most people would still be pissed it didn’t match the propaganda, even if they quoted western outlets.
https://www.liberationnews.org/tiananmen-the-massacre-that-wasnt-2/
Hmm, I wonder if the “Newspaper of the Party for Socialism and Liberation” might be somewhat biased 🤔
For sure. But they provide source information.
You have an unbiased source instead to recommend?
I haven’t made any claims, so what would I provide a source for?
So you’re not claiming their bias is informing disinformation?
Fucking tankie
Better than a fascist supporting Nazis.
The people you support are worth no more than nazis
Nazi apologist.
Who is that? Who do I support?
Have you read the article you linked?
You believe the Party for Socialism and Liberation to be equal to Nazis?
While US propaganda about China is definitely a thing, there is substantial videographic evidence of this event, well before the likes of picture-realistic graphics for video.
US propaganda existing, and the fact that some realities of Chinese history are grim are not mutually exclusive concepts.
I for one am a strong proponent of China being successful, I just hope they can reckon with their past instead of suppressing any mention of the “incident”.
True socialism involves the workers actually holding the levers of power directly or via representatives actually beholden to them. How can this be the case where political discussion is only tolerated on small scale and immediately shut-down if it gains any wider traction?