• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    his take on the petition was uneducated and seemed to stem mostly from a pro-industry perspective. it was like he misunderstood how government petitions in europe works and based all his criticism on that misunderstanding.

    basically the point he missed is that these petitions don’t become laws as written, but are put up for discussion. highlighting a problem in a niche where it is easy to understand usually ends up highlighting a broader issue.

    Thor took this flawed understanding and applied his substantial industry knowledge to it, which led him to the conclusion that games would be impossible to make if this petition won out because it would force companies to keep the servers up forever, which is not at all what the petition is about.

    he then refused to back down from this position when people tried to explain it better.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This, but there was also the WoW situation, and when he filed a false DMCA claim against an indie developers game, which got removed from Steam (but is back up now) over content shown in a video that was not actually present in the game files (Thor did not verify that what he was claiming was actually true).

      • shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is the problem with people who have massive audiences, they need to verify what they claim otherwise they can do a lot of harm to people.