Kennedy’s hearing signifies how close a man with medically racist beliefs is to becoming the US’s leading health official

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s not talking about Darwin’s views though, that’s talking about how scientific racism adapted and distorted Darwinism.

      Darwin was against slavery and connected to several abolitionists. Darwin never really promoted social Darwinism, and his writings point out how human society does take care of its weak/those who would not otherwise survive.

      Slavery, although in some ways beneficial during ancient times, is a great crime; yet it was not so regarded until quite recently, even by the most civilized nations. And this was especially the case, because the slaves belonged in general to a race different from that of their masters. As barbarians do not regard the opinion of their women, wives are commonly treated like slaves.

      Like these are not the words of an evil sexist pro slavery eugenicist. I would not argue that Darwin wasn’t sexist or racist at all - it’s the 1800s, they all are - but Darwin is not responsible for eugenics/social Darwinism.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        43 seconds ago

        The article I linked previously was the top result this one might be slightly better it contains some quotes

        Indeed, he articulated this same principle in his scientific study of human evolution, The Descent of Man (1871), where he claimed, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races.”

        Not only racism, but racial extermination was an integral feature of Darwin’s theory from the start.

        There is more this is only a small part. Darwin also had passion for misoginy