• ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trudeau’s comments aren’t exactly Earth-shattering revelations. By now, everybody with half a working brain should have learned that when Trump says something, you should believe him. Unlike the magats’, Trudeau’s brain is in working order.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      5 months ago

      when Trump says something, you should believe him.

      No. When Trump says something, you should believe that he might be delusional enough to believe it.

      • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        No. When Trump says something, about anything at all, whether it’s the truth, or a lie, a group of somebody’s somewhere, completely unrelated by tied inexorably to the fallout from it, is about to die.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      People are more stupid than you think. I brought up this exact topic on another platform (that the USA wants Canada for its resources include fresh water), and many US responders laughed like it was the stupidest thing I could have concocted. I explained that I didn’t come up with it it has been an ongoing thing since the 60s where US wanted a trench from Canada to the USA as a water feed, etc. People already believed their own conclusion and citing sources didn’t change their mind on Trumps ulterior motive.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It has been a concern for a long time that as drought bites in the USA and the Arctic becomes a strategic waterway, the USA will want what Canada has in its lakes, its coasts, its farmable land and its other natural resources. It’s just that Trump is accelerating the process, trying to get it done before Canada has a chance to prepare any resistance, and before many Canadians twig what’s going on. I’m quite sure he’s serious, and quite sure he isn’t the only one.

        Meanwhile Canadians are about to elect the most incompetent PM ever, whose only goal is to look tough and bigoted while screwing the little people, like Trump.

    • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      when Trump says something states his intentions, you should believe him. When he states a matter of fact you should definitely not believe him.

      FTFY

    • fourish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s not getting Canada. Never. We can trade with others. Might be more difficult but ok.

      He’s not going to last.

  • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s MANY things I dislike about Trudeau. I’ve been pretty impressed with his fast and appropriate responses on these issues. I’m so tired of people not taking the insanity seriously.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s handled basically every crisis well. It’s really easy to forget that. Remember his covid updates at the start of it? We watched those every day. I’m in Ottawa and with the Convoy every level of government massively failed, but he at least did the unpopular thing and shut that shit down. Last Trump presidency he dealt with NAFTA well.

      It’s really easy to dump on him, he’s done a poor job fiscally, housing policy was awful, immigration policy did not account for multiple levels of governance and support needed… but you can’t say he didn’t handle the most critical situations well.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m honestly just glad it’s not Mexico for once. We really, really don’t need to be messed with right now. It’s not that we wouldn’t be able to handle it, but we’re doing great for the first time in my life and I don’t want to see that spoiled.

    But whatever the outcome, it’s a reminder that we need to stand together.

  • Laser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    We need to take this seriously and be ready if they try to come for us

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      No i think the article here is that this is really a legitimate threat. And the US having veto power in Nato is a big fucking deal because that means we can’t rely on our Nato allies to do anything.

      They’re really serious about taking us over.

  • pouppa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Personally i would like to see a unified market with one currency like the EU did. We always put the EU on a pedestal in everything they do. So this should be an easy one to convince the people with.

  • Joe Dyrt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not Chump himself but lobbyists whispering in his ear about how rich they will all get extorting resources then selling them to John Q. Public.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is also why I am going for my firearms license this year.

    And once I have it, an FN-P90 with full-sized magazines. Plus something decently portable and long-range. Because if they cross the border in force - and America has had invasion plans refreshed every decade since WWII - I intend to make their occupation as painful as possible. We’ll definitely lose and be fully occupied - 40M vs 134M is no contest - but asymmetrical warfare can be exceedingly effective against a larger (and arrogant) aggressor.

    Who’s with me in getting their license to practice at the range with?

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You sound like a child. Anyways, full autos are not legal in Canada.

    • Carl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is highly illegal in Canada, so no. You should be reported to the government.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That is highly illegal in Canada, so no. You should be reported to the government.

        It won’t be illegal when the country doesn’t exist anymore.

        And if you want to roll over and show your belly to an invading aggressor, I have no problem lumping you in with other fascist collaborators.

      • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You have to finish a licensed class and pass the tests they give you, then you apply to the government and wait about a month to get your PAL in the mail assuming you pass the background checks.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          For my pal and my father’s it was about 4-8months to get it approved, but my father did mess up his photo and had to redo the application

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a one day course to take, then once you pass the exam it’s about 6 months to get it approved, then you can just walk into Canadian Tire and then walk out with a rifle.