• flamingos-cant@feddit.ukOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 days ago

    Only difference is that feddit.de didn’t go up for auction, it’s still running just with minimal user interaction.

    Doesn’t appear to be, there aren’t any IP addresses associated with feddit.de.

    ~> dig feddit.de any
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.18.30 <<>> feddit.de any
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 49617
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;feddit.de.			IN	ANY
    
    ;; Query time: 780 msec
    ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53) (TCP)
    ;; WHEN: Tue Feb 11 21:51:08 GMT 2025
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 38
    
    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      12 days ago

      You know it’s the Fediverse when you see people using dig instead of nslookup.

        • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It is the most unparseable. And are you using a Unix or Heil-Tim Cook-flavored variety?

          Unrelated kinda but I use nslookup because I thought it was more widely supported out of the box than dig?

          • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I use a GNU system, which as we all know isn’t Unix.

            Unrelated kinda but I use nslookup because I thought it was more widely supported out of the box than dig?

            I don’t think I’ve ever been in a situation where nslookup was available but dig wasn’t. On Fedora, they’re in the same package.