Xylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoApparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1152arrow-down147file-text
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imageApparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idXylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareseh@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·5 days agowhats wrong with it? i mean its up to the author if they want to make them exclusive to signed in users
minus-squarestinermanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoNot the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.
minus-squareseh@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agooh then i guess useless feature for now
whats wrong with it? i mean its up to the author if they want to make them exclusive to signed in users
Not the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.
oh then i guess useless feature for now