Mermotoso@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFaces of Homelessnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1797arrow-down19
arrow-up1788arrow-down1imageFaces of Homelessnesssh.itjust.worksMermotoso@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·2 days agoNo, reread what they said. Laws against employers requiring an address. Don’t be so quick to assume.
minus-squareofficermike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down14·2 days agoEven reading what they wrote, the context and intent were there, but the way it was written doesn’t align with their intent.
minus-squareZorque@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·2 days agoIt’s pretty easy to infer what they meant based on context. Provided you’re trying to understand what they mean and not divorcing all intent from the words.
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 days agoBut if I can’t get upset at things someone clearly didn’t mean, why bother going online at all?
minus-squareSoup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days ago“It” means the huge hurdle. It could have been better, for sure, but it’s fine.
No, reread what they said. Laws against employers requiring an address. Don’t be so quick to assume.
Even reading what they wrote, the context and intent were there, but the way it was written doesn’t align with their intent.
It’s pretty easy to infer what they meant based on context. Provided you’re trying to understand what they mean and not divorcing all intent from the words.
But if I can’t get upset at things someone clearly didn’t mean, why bother going online at all?
“It” means the huge hurdle. It could have been better, for sure, but it’s fine.