We now have a full year of data for the Cybertruck, and a strange preponderance of headlines about Cybertrucks exploding into flames, including several fatalities. That’s more than enough data to compare to the Ford Pinto, a car so notoriously combustible that it has become a watchword for corporate greed. Let’s start with the data…

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I know people just google stuff without looking into references, but let me do it for you:

    Reference: Kelly Blue Book, Study: Electric Vehicles Involved in Fewest Car Fires by Sean Tucker, January 28, 2022 Points to AutoInsuranceEZ.com which appears like the worst kind of EV slop: https://www.autoinsuranceez.com/gas-vs-electric-car-fires/?_cl=aC559XZjJUWkUEucak9lPfNY

    To find the rate of car fires by vehicle type, we collected the latest data on car fires from the NTSB and calculated the rate of fires from sales data from the BTS. Take a look at what we found below.

    1. Nothing on the time frame and the specific date range of the data.
    2. NTSB DOES not collect car accident data, NTHS does…

    I.e. this reference is useless and surprisingly low quality for a .gov site.

    Your best data is from Sweden and that also doesn’t provide rate of fatalities so this whole thing isn’t settled when it comes to fires with injuries (the rate for that is about 0.6%)in ICEV dominated data: https://www.nfpa.org/education-and-research/research/nfpa-research/fire-statistical-reports/vehicle-fires)

    I do think that EVs are safer, this is why I drive one (not a tesla…), but if an EV burns, that a huge issue. And again, drawing conclusions from 2 accidents over a year vs. 10 years of pinto data is well…not a good comparison.