• vonbaronhans
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      So, I gave this a cursory read.

      The discussion of essentialism mostly makes sense, if a few weird red flags scattered throughout. But I was curious at what point it would be turned into, as promised in the intro, that essentialism is a fundamental flaw of “wokeism”, and apparently specifically Critical Race Theory.

      And uh. That connection was poorly made, in my humble opinion. It’s a lot of philosophical history and bluster to then just sort of… miss the point and mischaracterize the quotes being put on the table.

      My apologies, I would be more specific and pointed in my critique here, but I’m on mobile and I usually need a better setup (e.g. on PC) to lay out these thoughts with more precision.

      • neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Ah that what happens when you Google an article which explanes some historical connection to Plato etc but it then uses that to make a completely unrelated point ie woke is bad. I should have read the whole thing before linking it. Looking at the other articles on the site it is indeed mostly right wing propaganda. A better point is Dawnkin’s post about Platonic forms here https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25366 in response to the question what scientific idea should be retired in 2014? He points out essentialism is a problem for accepting evolution, and for so many other things.

        • vonbaronhans
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oof. Yeah they’ll get ya like that. I’m certainly not immune.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Your link isn’t working properly.

      It’s a cool read though - I’m still reading it, but so far it did a great job showing that concepts are fuzzy and inside our heads, not those well-defined abstractions in some external realm.