Charlie Jane Anders discusses KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act).

If you’re in the US, https://www.stopkosa.com/ makes it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

"A new bill called the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, is sailing towards passage in the Senate with bipartisa>n support. Among other things, this bill would give the attorney general of every state, including red states, the right to sue Internet platforms if they allow any content that is deemed harmful to minors. This clause is so vaguely defined that attorneys general can absolutely claim that queer content violates it — and they don’t even need to win these lawsuits in order to prevail. They might not even need to file a lawsuit, in fact. The mere threat of an expensive, grueling legal battle will be enough to make almost every Internet platform begin to scrub anything related to queer people.

The right wing Heritage Foundation has already stated publicly that the GOP will use this provision to remove any discussions of trans or queer lives from the Internet. They’re salivating over the prospect.

And yep, I did say this bill has bipartisan support. Many Democrats have already signed on as co-sponsors. And President Joe Biden has urged lawmakers to pass this bill in the strongest possible terms."

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ah yes… forever and again, the siren song of children being used as an excuse for draconian, rights eroding legislation… its amazing how much responsibility parents have shirked to the state as they replace babysitters with cellphones and tablets.

    • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      grillman: “You REALLY want little Billy to read a tweet that makes him think he’s not perfect because he’s white!? YOU MONSTER! Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to relentlessly stalk and then bully this freak I found on KiwiFarms for the crime of not being a good normal like me!”

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It isn’t so much parents shirking responsibility as folks in power doing what they want and just saying parents demanded it. When actual parents want something there’s a lot more hue and cry, hearings, and suchlike. When there isn’t, dig a bit and you find convenient lies and excuses.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fascists always use “protecting children” as the rationale for implementing mechanisms of social control. Their willingness to allow school shootings shows that they really don’t care about protecting children at all.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Attent #452625 at destroying the Internet and counting.

    They only need to succeed big once or small a couple of times. They already succeeded small big many times so yeah. Enjoy the internet while it lasts, 5 years from now it will be unrecognizeable and a fraction of what we have now.

    But at least the kids are safe because THAT is why we are doing this, right? RIGHT?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can… can you please just kill me now? Just a bullet between my skull, do it while I’m playing Baldur’s Gate… don’t even wanna know you’re doing it.

    Just wanna fall asleep and wake up on some kind of astral plane where things make sense

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t know if that’s lucky. It means you are at the wims of others you can not influence.

        • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks for making the effort! On bills like this, enough pressure can make a difference – we stopped KOSA from passing last year, and have a good chance this year as well.

        • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s disappointing … but, enough pressure can get them to change their position (or, almost as good, ask Schumer not to bring the bill to the floor so that they don’t have to take a politically costly vote). In the Senate Commerce Committee hearing, both Cantwell and Markey voted yes but said they had gotten a lot of calls and email from constituents who were concerned about the impact on LGBTQ+ teens so there was work to do before bringing the bill to the floor … so the pressure is definitely getting noticed!

          • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            One of my senators in on this list. His replies when a constituent disagrees with him are always a dismissal. The other senator who isn’t on there is Ted Cruz…

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Somehow neither of my senators customers cosponsored, but I’m guessing they’ll both sign. We passed someone similar in my state recently, so I’m not expecting much.

        I’ll contact them though. I guess it can’t hurt.

      • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        God in a campaign defined by hilarious self inflicted pratt falls I can’t believe they slapped Tim Karnes dumbass into Hillary vp slot.

        And then tried to whitewash him as “your boring uncle (please don’t look into any of his actual policy positions)”

    • Fazoo@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Experiencing a protracted regression of sanity, similar to Brexit.

    • cantsurf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No, no, it’s “free dumbs”. As in, they were giving away stupidity for free, so we each took as much as we could carry.

      • IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hey now, American kids love oil and it’s good for them. They should rewrite the bill to remove all content that isn’t about oil. Not avocado oil or malarkey like that though. That stuff is bad news, unlike petroleum oil. They may call it crude but we gotta make sure the kids know crude means good. The more crude the healthier the babies, that’s what I always say.