• prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Canada has the same incentive to not open the door to Chinese EVs that the US does.

    Why would they shoot themselves in the face just to splash some blood on someone else?

    • Gewoonmoi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Canada doesn’t have the incentives that the Americans have at all. Correct me if I’m wrong. America’s incentive is to protect its own EV industry, Canada doesn’t have an EV industry of its own.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re wrong. Just the nature of of the auto industry makes it a little confusing since the entirety of a car isn’t manufactured in one country. But there are a lot of components for EVs manufactured in Canada. There’s especially a focus on manufacturing batteries for EVs which is the single most important component in an EV. And more plants for battery manufacturing are under construction.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It isn’t that an inexpensive electric vehicle from China is bad, in fact that’s great.

        The issue is that the cars are subsidized at such a rate that it goes beyond domestic incentive and into “we’ll just make sure no matter what we can sell for less than the competition” in an effort to drive any competition out of business.

        It’s an anticompetitive practice that has significant impacts if allowed unchecked.

        This is not meant as a value statement about the west, USA or Canada … as in I’m not saying “China bad when they do it, west good when they do it” because it’s bad when it’s done by whoever does it.

        Effectively it’s a lever to weaponize fair trade and that’s antithetical to the idea of fair trade, at least insomuch as the international community tends to agree.

        • BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A worthwhile note is also that pretty much all US car manufacturers have dragged their feet doing EVs, excluding Tesla. So naturally US car manufacturers are struggling a lot with the massive costs related to adopting EVs now, and struggle competing with a country that spent this money getting established a good while ago.

          The subsidies are still a problem, but the 100% tax is in my view a massive handout to domestic manufacturers that never bothered to try until they were behind. That 100% price increase in Chinese will probably mean high margins on EVs for yet some years before cheap alternatives come along.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes but Canada has no EV industry… so, even if it’s just temporarily to provide Canadians with an option while telling American companies to suck it… what’s the problem?

          Are we really going to say we don’t to business with China because of anti-competitive practices when we have been doing business with American doing WAY worse all along?

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s not just US companies harmed.

            One also would think more long term and hope for better relations with Canada and USA having more cooperative relations especially as it pertains to an auto market.

            Regardless harming your European allies to spite the US isn’t ideal either.

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              It’s not just US companies harmed.

              Who else is harmed in this case?

              One also would think more long term and hope for better relations with Canada and USA having more cooperative relations especially as it pertains to an auto market.

              Why? this is exactly what we had and Trump destroyed… why would be trust them again? ever?.. even if we go back to a trade agreement, there should be hard guarantees in place to be able to trust the USA again in pretty much anything

              Regardless harming your European allies to spite the US isn’t ideal either.

              Why would that be the case at all? I am all for opening the Canadian market to European auto makers (very few make it here)… Most people who can afford it never buy American cars anyway as they are fairly low in everything when compared to Asian or European brands.

              Why would reducing tariffs on Chinese EVs harm European allies when we already barely allow them into the Canadian market?

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Why does that matter to Canada? They don’t make their own EVs. They have no domestic manufacturers to protect against dumping. Might as well just get as many cheap vehicles as you can, while you can.