• popcar2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh hey, it’s been a while since I’ve written this. Thanks for sharing it again. When I posted it last year to the fediverse community, people were not ready for it.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Excellent write-up of the problem and its potential solutions!

      Do you know if Proposal 3 has made it to the Lemmy devs? If so, what was their response to it?

      • popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I haven’t checked since making this post but when the idea was floating around the devs said they preferred multi-communities (proposal 2). That’s still on the Lemmy roadmap but isn’t here yet.

        That said, Piefed apparently implemented something similar to proposal 3 so maybe the devs can change their mind and copy them instead.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Piefed apparently implemented something similar to proposal 3

          Have they? Blaze linked to a thread on the implementation of Piefed “feeds”, which is a form of Proposal 2 (multi-communities). Have they also implemented Proposal 3 (communities following each other) as well?

          I really hope the devs consider Proposal 3, as it seems like the solution which best fixes fragmentation.

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I guess the confusion comes from the fact that Piefed feeds can be followed by other people, so it’s a bit more than “just” proposal 2. But yes, it’s not full proposal 3 either.