• Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, merging communities means trying to reduce the number of alternative communities on the same topic, or did I miss something?

    But, like I said, I’m not saying it is not doable. I’m only sharing how I felt reading the OP post.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, merging communities means trying to reduce the number of alternative communities on the same topic, or did I miss something?

      No, that’s Proposal 1. Proposal 3 means retaining a number of alternative communities on the same topic while syncing posts and comments between them.

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Oh, I did not get that. That’s an interesting idea. Would still need to solve the ‘where’ do I post (which for many seems to also mean ‘to what Instance do I belong’), and then how do one moderate content from various communities, from posters that may or may not adhere to one’s own rules. It won’t be obvious but I would be more than willing to see something like being experimented, even if it’s to decide it’s too complex, it seems worth at least an attempt, imho.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Would still need to solve the ‘where’ do I post

          Proposal 3 makes that a non-issue. If pancakes@a.com and pancakes@b.com follow each other, a user can post to either community and their post will show up on both communities, with a shared comments section.

          I don’t foresee significant moderation challenges, but if any unresolvable issues did come up, communities could simply unfollow each other and go back to being separate communities.