• jjpamsterdam@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I honestly did no see this coming. PSG ertainly is a stronger team than it was a few years ago and is playing some real football. However, after winning the first leg, I was convinced that the Reds would also manage to get this tie sorted. Well, I guess it’s likely “only” the Premier League title for Liverpool then.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I felt that they were pretty bad in the first leg, the difference between the number of shots for the first leg was insane, a lesser keeper and they would have been 3 or 4 down. Second leg they played much better, to be expected with the switch to playing at home.

      Overall PSG were the better side.

      • jjpamsterdam@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Exactly. That’s what convinced me that Liverpool would edge past PSG. Normally no team that steals a result on an off day and then improves in the second leg goes out. This match showed that this feeling was premature.

    • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      To be fair, PSG were not playing like a top 3 team at the start of the season. It is only later on that the team clicked.

      Also to win a title, you should have to beat the best. No use crying about it.