• tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I felt that they were pretty bad in the first leg, the difference between the number of shots for the first leg was insane, a lesser keeper and they would have been 3 or 4 down. Second leg they played much better, to be expected with the switch to playing at home.

    Overall PSG were the better side.

    • jjpamsterdam@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Exactly. That’s what convinced me that Liverpool would edge past PSG. Normally no team that steals a result on an off day and then improves in the second leg goes out. This match showed that this feeling was premature.