• Jesus_666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I would’ve made you pay him. Every tariff is a tax but not every tax is a tariff. Of course your actual point still stands.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        According to Merriam-Webster, “income tax” is a synonym of “value-added tax” and “property tax”. And it can be, depending on context, but few people would argue that they are always synonymous. It’s the same with “tariff” and “tax”. Whether or not they are synonymous depends on context.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        My point exactly. The bet was about whether “tariff” and “tax” are synonymous. They aren’t synonymous if they describe different things, even if one of those things is a subset of the other. (This is complicated a bit by the fact that synonymity is context-dependent so in some contexts they can be synonymous. I’m assuming a general context.)

        To give a different example, every iPhone is a smartphone but not every smartphone is an iPhone. The two terms aren’t synonymous except in specific contexts like when discussing the inventory of an Apple store.

        In a general context, I would argue that the bet is lost – tariffs are taxes but taxes encompass more than just tariffs. The definition of synonymity is not fulfilled.

        The actual point of the bet, namely to illustrate that tariffs are paid by people in the country that raised them (because they are taxes on imported goods and services), remains valid.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          thesauris.com, merriam-webster, and collins all disagree with you.

          They aren’t synonymous if they describe different things

          This is clearly false. Obviously the degree of difference determines whether terms are synonymous. You’re correct that not all taxes are tariffs. Apparently however that doesn’t mean they’re not synonyms.

          Additionally one term being a subset of the other evidently does not preclude being a synonym.

          If you have a bet, and every dictionary says that you’re wrong, then you should just graciously pay up.