• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I suspect their ultimate goal is to confirm or refute the common theory that there’s a general mental faculty for recursion that’s used both for natural language and for other recursive tasks (implying that language and recursive thought evolved together).

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If that’s their goal then it was a really dumb idea to pick these conlangs. It simply won’t show any surprising data, since all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way

        Yeah—Python and English are both recursive, so that doesn’t account for why the brain processes them differently. But they need to figure out what other feature does account for it—ideally by finding a pair of (probably artificial) languages that differ only in the exact feature which triggers the language network. Then they can figure out how that feature relates to recursion or any other mental abilities that might have co-evolved with language.