• Sheldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s preferential pay. It’s just that they pay more, somebody in the union also can get more money than the union minimum. Somebody not part of the union can get less or more than somebody in the union, just not below the union minimum.

    It’s not that if they join the union that they get less money. The union + 0.5 just means that they earn better than the minimum and the employer gives them more than the minimum, because people like that.

    At least that’s how it works where I live and union contracts are common.

    Not everyone part of the union has to get exactly the union minimum, it’s just that you cannot legally get less. People might not be part of the union but they still fall under the union contract negotiated by the union, because it applies to the entire company.

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So even then, the union people might be making more than the union minimum, so the non union person might still be making less than an average union person while not getting any union benefits.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My contract states that we make $0.50/hr above union wages

      You may be right, but it certainly sounds like she’s claiming it’s contractual, explicit, and general policy.