In the piece — titled “Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?” — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    He didn’t think they were better. He thought Tesla could get away without the more expensive lidar. Basically “humans can drive with just vision, that should be enough for an autonomous vehicle also.” Basically he did it because lidar is more expensive.

    • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Even if humans can drive with just vision:

      1. Human vision has superb dynamic range, auto focus and other features that cameras thousands of dollars could only dream of (for most).
      2. I don’t want self driving cars to drive like humans. Humans make too many mistakes and are prone to bad decisions (see the need for safety systems in the first place).
      3. Train and bus transport is better for most people. Driving is a luxury, we’ve forced people that should not be driving to do so in order to keep a job and barely survive.
      • blady_blah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Human vision is great, human attention is not and neither is their reaction time. Computers are 100x better at both of those. If you throw lidar into the mix, then a car’s vision is now much better than a humans.

        IMHO self driving cars have to be statistically 10x better than humans to be widely implemented. If it passes that threshold them I’m fine with them.