cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/23396300

show transcript

nickyflowers posts:

it would be cool if websites let you be an adult on them. the advertisers and payment processors need everything to be Family Friendly though and their definitions of family and friendly are absolutely fucked. but since they’re in charge of the Internet now, no one is allowed to be an adult. tiktokers say things like “unalive” and “seggs” because they know death and sex are too adult for online. online is for idiot babies only now because they’re easier to market to

nickyflowers replies:
oh im sorry you’re a trans adult? super ban. you are super banned for life. you have upset Visa’s feelings. Mastercard is throwing up in the corner. how could you do this to Google Ads?

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The companies doing this are americans and americans are pussies who think sitting in sauna naked with your same-sex family members is traumatic but watching endless gore is fun. The mindless religious zealotry, their puritan ancestors and lack of separation between church and real life is to blame.

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    I blame the rise of nu-puritanism on Google and payment processors. It’s a load of bullshit that people can’t even have negative feelings these days.

  • PeteWheeler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yup.

    If I can’t say basic words and facts like, this woman was raped, this man died, etc.

    I just don’t use the website in any meaningful way.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    The US religious fundamentalists have managed to impose their fucked up values on the world. Calling it “family values” was always a lie.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Hurting someones feelings or being offended is the worst thing an american could ever go through. It absolutely tanks ad revenue.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      these people cannot be a part of society. put them on an island with no minerals and let them live in log cabins and fuck their children and do patriarchy all day.

      or maybe you think that’s evil and unkind to the children, and they should just be killed and the children freed. whatever.

  • muxika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fediverse and DNS sinkholes FTW. Any way I can avoid becoming someone’s money is nice.

  • AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, I dont understand either. Why the fuck cant you say suicide? When someone kills themselves, thats suicide, not ‘unalive’.

    Whats next, people cant even say ‘unalive’?

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s because the app reportedly limits and is more selective with videos that contain certain words. Death, rape, suicide, homicide, genocide, murder, etc. it can also pull your video. They don’t do it because they are sparing anyone’s feelings, their saying it that way to avoid their videos being taken down it hidden.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been saying for years that the advertiser-friendly neo-puritanicalism that was infecting the left was a trojan horse for conservatism, and then here we are.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Insistence on decorum, general anti-sex sentiments, curtailing of language to adhere to advertiser-friendly standards, to name a few.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I think all of that is true when it comes to mainstream public events, but bath houses are still a thing and queer people are still having a lot of sex. Playing to your audience is just strategic.

          • Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, if I’m being honest.

            I will say though that having sex and being pro-sex are two extremely different things, and the existence of one does not in any way imply the existence of the other.

            • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, if I’m being honest.

              Advertisers didn’t change queer people, queer people changed advertisers.

              I will say though that having sex and being pro-sex are two extremely different things, and the existence of one does not in any way imply the existence of the other.

              How can someone have lots of sex without being pro-sex? You’re incorrectly conflating the idea of doing sexual things in general and the idea of doing sexual things in public; most Pride events are less overtly sexual now than they were in the past, but that’s not a reduction to the original goals of Pride.

              • Vespair@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Advertisers didn’t change queer people, queer people changed advertisers.

                You’re not immune to marketing and conditioning. It’s not a one-way street, it’s two-way.

                How can someone have lots of sex without being pro-sex?

                I dunno, maybe ask the Catholic Church, or the Mormon Church, or any other famously anti-sex organization that promotes heavy breeding but still uses harmful shame tied to sex as a a means of control?

                You’re incorrectly conflating the idea of doing sexual things in general and the idea of doing sexual things in public; most Pride events are less overtly sexual now than they were in the past, but that’s not a reduction to the original goals of Pride.

                No, I’m not. You’re conflating being pro-sex with being sexually active.

      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        C’mon, you don’t have to look very hard to find puritanical, anti-sex ‘leftists’

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes advertisers like chase and Walmart and visa are truly the most left you can be.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not calling those who craft and insist on this kind of language left, I am calling the people who accept and use it supposedly part of the left (in vague terms).

        You are making my point. My point is that conservativism is charlatans and we becomes their stooges when we play according to their terms, including on the field of language.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I definitely don’t know what your point is, still. Genuinely no offense, but English is clearly not your first language and I don’t understand what you’re trying to say.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Relatively easy fix though. Get away from advertiser supported platforms and use community supported ones.

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    funnily enough on tiktok you can say “fuckass” but you cant say someone’s intelligence is akin to that of a toaster or that someone is stupid. i have also seen the n word multiple times

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The term “unalive” is so cringey yet dystopian that I don’t know whether to feel embarrassed or concerned when I hear it.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      It started out as a fun way to make light of Disney refusing to allow the word “Kill” to show up in the cartoon adaptation of Ultimate Spider-Man, now when I hear it in a youtube true crime video I want to game end myself.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve got a list of backups:

        • cooked
        • spaced (see The Expanse)
        • inhumed (as opposed to exhumed as one might do in removing a corpse from a grave; see Terry Pratchett’s Discworld’s Assassins Guild lingo)
        • processed (as one does to food using a food processor)
        • isekai’d (for the weaboos)
        • truck-kun’d
        • terminated (for when the Terminator movies become popular again)
        • old yeller’d
        • returned to sender (until the postal system collapses)
        • X trimester aborted
        • Peter Pan’d (as in, thrown off a cliff and expected to fly)
        • Mufasa’d (or any notable fictional character whose death was a major plot point)
    • wagesj45@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t worry about that one too much. Death has a ton of euphemisms to soften the concept; “passing away”, “transitioning”, “going home”, etc and so on and whatnot.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean it comes up basically every day here where people complain about censorship in a screenshot submitted to some shitpost or meme community.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hashtags are a Twitter invention and Lemmy is a decentralized reddit clone and reddit doesn’t use hashtags so no.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kinda (no).
        On Lemmy hashtags are just to format a header, as you’ve shown. However, you might see them seemingly randomly because microblog users can post to lemmy and they use them because hashtags work as tags for them.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Demonitising youtubers has made the Internet say

      Unalive

      A baby have been formed

      Frick

      And other shit it’s stupid and the self censoring of fuck is annoying. I mean I would love for the Americans to invent new swear words. In German the censoring almost always fail since we have way to many words for insulting or swearing. Some are always free to use.

      But the Americans just censor fuck instead of getting creative. Boring as a speech of Trump.

      • SeitanicMechanic@vegantheoryclub.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is just the surface-level stuff that people see and get annoyed with. This faux puritanical censorship is also used to blot out content on “sensitive subjects” that would otherwise be informative to people but harmful to the corporate or state image. It’s getting harder and harder for news on the Palestinian genocide to trend before it gets shadowbanned on any platform, just as an example.

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    George Carlin warned us about this 30 years ago.

    I’d link to it but I’m in the middle of a severance theory video.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Twitter is filled with porn and racism but still has payment processing and ads. 4chan has payment processing. I don’t think this is a universal truth. It’s more like some sites purposefully chose to have strict guidelines for whatever reasons.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Sorry guys, the ad people don’t like it.” was just an excuse, the real goal was censorship of the web.

      If Corporations are allowed to set the rules as to what gets talked about and what can’t be mentioned, it’s easier to flood the net with advertisements for their products.