Justice Brett Kavanaugh said Thursday that the Supreme Court is working on “concrete steps” to address ethics issues at the high court amid an array of recent news stories on justices’ travel and relationships with political donors.
Appearing before an audience of judges and lawyers during a judicial conference in Ohio, Kavanaugh noted that Chief Justice John Roberts had pledged in May to assure the public that the court was committed to adhering to the highest standards of conduct.
“The chief justice spoke about that in May and said that we are continuing to work on those issues and that is accurate,” Kavanaugh told the audience. “We are continuing to work on those issues and I’m hopeful that there will be some concrete steps taken soon on that.”
Removed by mod
I get the idea that the final ethics code will be ‘Republican Aligned Justices can do what ever they want, Democratic Aligned Justices can be impeached for disagreeing with anything.’
Well that’s the way republicans in congress already act, of Thomas would have been impeached and removed already. The ethics rules are just for internal discipline rules at SCOTUS.
And the way he talked about beer, I’m pretty sure he drinks Coors Light.
deleted by creator
Get about 8 beers deep.
Do a super weird, horrible fake cry on camera.
Now that everyone has turned of the TV, grab the prettiest female reporter. The Republicans won’t care about one more rape.
Step 1: How to avoid scrutiny that might put our ethics on display.
Step 2: legalize things we currently get that might appear unethical.
Step 3: profit
I mean Brett Kavanaugh is just the beacon of ethics.
Rapist says what?
Beer? I mean what?
If you’re still there, they aren’t nearly stringent enough, Rapey McKavanaugh.
If they wanted it done, they could just adopt the same ethics rules that every other court in America has to abide. If they’re working on anything, it’s how to keep getting free vacations and gifts from donors without having to disclose them or, god forbid, someone on the court having to experience consequences for their corruption.
Knowing Thomas he’d probably argue for the rules then argue he’s exempt because he got the job before they were implemented.
Ohh sorry I guess there is no higher court that can compell us to do that. Also congress can’t either…sorry. I guess there are no real checks on our power jeeze.
The cunt that lied to get his position is going to tell us about ethics now. Fucking clown.
Must be nice to decide for yourself which rules will apply to you.
Yeah, our US police have been doing it for years.
From a group of people that thinks transparency is having a set list of prices for their rulings.
Cool. I want three resignations. Openly corrupt Thomas, the rapist who isn’t Merrick garland, and the lying christofascist who was placed at the last minute. Sure only one of these is related to the court’s corruptions. But they’re all a corruption of the court. I also want rules on what happens with the senate in the situations of the other two, because either they refused to do their constitutional job and should be punished once or they violated the spirit of the rule in a partisan power grab.
deleted by creator
What McConnell did was shady, unethical, and as dirty is as it gets in politics, but all legal unfortunately. You can just arrest political opponents like that. To say so is even dangerous. You sound like the republicans who are openly calling for that and want to do that. That is the sound of authoritarianism and totalitarianism. That is the path we are trying to prevent from happening in our country right now. You cannot go and make statements like that. I hate McTurtle as much as anyone, but we can’t say to arrest him when he hasn’t broken any laws.
Obama should have appointed Garland anyway since Congress was refusing to give “advice and consent” as required by the constitution. Much like a recess appointment, but McConnell made sure Congress never recessed either, just to avoid that.
deleted by creator
And you sound just like the people you despise. While the left needs to stop playing so nice, obeying the law is crucial. Without it, what are you fighting for?
deleted by creator
Fox gives assurances on improved henhouse security
I hope we revoke the Trump appointed asshats when Trump gets his jail time…
“We’re TOTALLY going to start policing ourselves one day. Just you wait and see. When? This year isn’t good we have an election coming up and we need to make sure the American people can weigh in on this very important matter [so we can see if Republicans will overthrow democracy and we can move on from this without change. Clarence’s mom ain’t paying rent and I got “baseball tickets” ill need another “small” loan for…].”
They’re going to be concrete steps by which they can investigate and clear themselves out and wrongdoing, before they head out on vacation with their billionaire “friends”.
Can’t imagine a world where anything they come up with has any bite or actually correct any of the ongoing problems. The number of cases where justices should’ve recused themselves for conflicts of interests seems to just keep growing.
