Justice Brett Kavanaugh said Thursday that the Supreme Court is working on “concrete steps” to address ethics issues at the high court amid an array of recent news stories on justices’ travel and relationships with political donors.

Appearing before an audience of judges and lawyers during a judicial conference in Ohio, Kavanaugh noted that Chief Justice John Roberts had pledged in May to assure the public that the court was committed to adhering to the highest standards of conduct.

“The chief justice spoke about that in May and said that we are continuing to work on those issues and that is accurate,” Kavanaugh told the audience. “We are continuing to work on those issues and I’m hopeful that there will be some concrete steps taken soon on that.”

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get the idea that the final ethics code will be ‘Republican Aligned Justices can do what ever they want, Democratic Aligned Justices can be impeached for disagreeing with anything.’

      • bemenaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that’s the way republicans in congress already act, of Thomas would have been impeached and removed already. The ethics rules are just for internal discipline rules at SCOTUS.

  • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they wanted it done, they could just adopt the same ethics rules that every other court in America has to abide. If they’re working on anything, it’s how to keep getting free vacations and gifts from donors without having to disclose them or, god forbid, someone on the court having to experience consequences for their corruption.

    Knowing Thomas he’d probably argue for the rules then argue he’s exempt because he got the job before they were implemented.

    • ButtermilkBiscuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ohh sorry I guess there is no higher court that can compell us to do that. Also congress can’t either…sorry. I guess there are no real checks on our power jeeze.

  • geosoco@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t imagine a world where anything they come up with has any bite or actually correct any of the ongoing problems. The number of cases where justices should’ve recused themselves for conflicts of interests seems to just keep growing.

  • deadtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “We’re TOTALLY going to start policing ourselves one day. Just you wait and see. When? This year isn’t good we have an election coming up and we need to make sure the American people can weigh in on this very important matter [so we can see if Republicans will overthrow democracy and we can move on from this without change. Clarence’s mom ain’t paying rent and I got “baseball tickets” ill need another “small” loan for…].”

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re going to be concrete steps by which they can investigate and clear themselves out and wrongdoing, before they head out on vacation with their billionaire “friends”.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cunt that lied to get his position is going to tell us about ethics now. Fucking clown.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool. I want three resignations. Openly corrupt Thomas, the rapist who isn’t Merrick garland, and the lying christofascist who was placed at the last minute. Sure only one of these is related to the court’s corruptions. But they’re all a corruption of the court. I also want rules on what happens with the senate in the situations of the other two, because either they refused to do their constitutional job and should be punished once or they violated the spirit of the rule in a partisan power grab.

      • bemenaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        What McConnell did was shady, unethical, and as dirty is as it gets in politics, but all legal unfortunately. You can just arrest political opponents like that. To say so is even dangerous. You sound like the republicans who are openly calling for that and want to do that. That is the sound of authoritarianism and totalitarianism. That is the path we are trying to prevent from happening in our country right now. You cannot go and make statements like that. I hate McTurtle as much as anyone, but we can’t say to arrest him when he hasn’t broken any laws.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obama should have appointed Garland anyway since Congress was refusing to give “advice and consent” as required by the constitution. Much like a recess appointment, but McConnell made sure Congress never recessed either, just to avoid that.

  • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder that trump appointed a Christian cultist and a frat bro rapist to the Supreme Court. No one should listen to a goddamn thing these unfit rejects have to say. Read any dissent by the actually educated and fit to serve liberal justices and it’s clear that they are forced to watch as the court is hijacked by vile traitors to this nation.

    The only thing that will change this all is just sheer force of will. Vote every single time. Encourage everyone you know to vote. Super majorities can happen. Elect people that will take steps to right this boat. No more pandering to christofascists .

    Anything less ensures the pendulum will inevitably one day swing back the other way. The second this occurs they’ve made it clear it will never come back again.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Step 1: How to avoid scrutiny that might put our ethics on display.

    Step 2: legalize things we currently get that might appear unethical.

    Step 3: profit

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really? Crying beer man who got everything handed to him on a silver platter who when for the first time in his life was questioned, broke down in tears?

  • preppietechie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could start by at least following the same rules every other federal judge must follow. The fact that they don’t simply agree to those rules and then work on strengthening the rules for members of the highest court in the land shows how disingenuous Kavanaugh’s claims are.