Wisconsin Republicans are already thinking of impeachment for the state’s newest Supreme Court justice, Insider reported. Janet Protasiewicz handily won her seat in April on a platform heavily focused on abortion rights, giving the court a 4-3 liberal majority after a long period of conservative control. But it’s her criticism of the state’s legislative maps — which she called “rigged” during the campaign, and have given the GOP a lock on power in Madison — that have earned Republican ire.

The GOP argument is that Protasiewicz “prejudged” a case challenging the state’s legislative maps when she called them “rigged,” Ian Millhiser wrote for Vox. But the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that candidates for office have a right to “publicly state their positions on contentious legal issues.” The real point here, though, is that knocking Protasiewicz off the court would almost certainly leave the maps in place, making the GOP impeachment push a “plan that could entrench their rule forever.”

In fact, impeachment would only be successful because of Wisconsin’s gerrymandering, Philip Bump wrote at The Washington Post. Republicans have “disproportionate power” in the Wisconsin Legislature because of aggressive map drawing, and now they’re “using that disproportionate power in consideration of impeachment and removal.” In essence, gerrymandered power is being used to defend gerrymandered power. And that raw display is drawing national attention.

‘Severe threat to democracy’

Impeaching Protasiewicz would be the “most direct, severe threat to democracy in our state history,” Wisconsin State Sen. Melissa Agard, a Democrat, wrote in Madison’s The Cap Times. The impeachment push comes “before the new justice has even heard one case from the bench.” Wisconsin is a “purple state” that is “increasingly blue.” Impeachment “would overturn an election and the will of the people.”

The impeachment threat “amounts to extortion,” Richard Niess wrote at the Wisconsin Examiner. It’s a threat that Protasiewicz will lose her job unless she does as the GOP-controlled legislature wishes, proof that “Wisconsin’s toxic gerrymandering destroys our democracy.” Joel McNally at Milwaukee’s Shepherd Express agreed, but argued that impeachment would only “succeed in alienating the large majority of Wisconsin voters who elected Protasiewicz.” Republicans trying to stave off rising Democratic sentiment in the state would “just be delaying the inevitable.”

Protasiewicz’s comments about “rigged” maps were “entirely inconsistent with the neutral administration of law,” Dan O’Donnell wrote for The MacIver Institute. But it’s not an impeachable offense under the Wisconsin Constitution. Republicans might proceed anyway because “it’s precisely what Democrats would do if given the chance, right?” The GOP should still try to consider the “wisdom in maintaining the moral, legal and constitutional high ground.”

‘Unbreakable hold on state government’

“If Republicans move ahead with this impeachment, it will be for one reason only: because they think they can,” Michelle Goldberg wrote for The New York Times. But the Wisconsin GOP hasn’t entirely gerrymandered itself out of accountability; 12 Republican members of the lower chamber and six in the Wisconsin Senate represent districts won by Protasiewicz. “We’ll soon find out whether Wisconsin Republicans think they have to pretend to care.”

“The gerrymandering alone undermines Wisconsin’s status as a democracy,” Jamelle Bouie wrote, also at The New York Times. If a majority of voters cannot elect a government of their choosing “then it’s hard to say whether they actually govern themselves.” Protasiewicz won a “double-digit victory” to obtain the Wisconsin Supreme Court seat that Republicans are now threatening to strip from her. That’s dangerous. “If successful, Wisconsin Republicans will have created, in effect, an unbreakable hold on state government.”

The fight isn’t over yet. Democrats are planning a $4 million “ad blitz” targeting GOP lawmakers considering impeachment, Fox News reported. “Republicans are holding a political nuclear football,” said Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler. Meanwhile, The Associated Press pointed out that Wisconsin’s conservative justices have often failed to recuse themselves in situations where they had a potential conflict of interest yet faced no threat of impeachment. “If they don’t like the way the situation is now,” said one observer, “all they have to do is look at their own behavior.”

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    The GOP hates democracy, at its fundamental core. These days, the group stands for an authoritarian regime. They should all just move to North Korea.

    • david@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Or Russia. Trump admires Putin after all, and Putin would welcome them with open arms. He’s needing more troops for the front lines in Ukraine.

  • RMiddleton@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    I felt highly agitated when I first learned of this plan but then I got more information and I calmed down a bit. From what I’ve read if this justice is removed the governor, a Democrat, would be entitled to appoint a replacement—possibly the same removed justice. Or someone else liberal & the removed justice could run again. There’s a way the Republicans could try more fuckery by the state house impeaching and the state senate refusing to hold a trial, because the state law says that an impeached official is barred from serving until the trial results in removal or acquittal. So GOP could try to say that once impeached the justice cannot serve, but delay the trial in the senate to avoid the governor appointing a replacement. Sigh this is so long! So anyway that’s a very narrow route to guaranteeing they get the result they want & obviously it bumps up against the article excerpts above, that voters would be angered and some GOP legislators are in unsafe districts. And finally if they did do that convoluted process to sideline a justice but delay the governor being able to appoint a successor I think the governor could very well rightfully interpret the situation as a vacancy on the court and appoint anyway. Which would of course probably go to court!

    Phew.

    I think all factors considered the situation in Wisconsin is not completely bleak.

    Now the US Supreme Court, on the other hand, is a horrific tragedy.

    • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m the case of impeachment with no trial to permanently suspend Protasiewicz she also has the option to resign, which will allow Gov. Evers to choose a replacement… which can include Protasiewicz. This however would mean instead of serving her current 10 year term she would only serve 1, and while not ideal she clearly won her election by double digits and being unfairly impeached would probably just make her more popular.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The fact that they repeatedly use the word trial here would normally present an interesting legal conundrum, as the impeached judge would have a constitutional right to a fair and speedy trial. Unfortunately the supreme court would likely end up ruling on what that means, and they’re openly and blatantly corrupt so I don’t expect their ruling to have anything to do with either the facts or the law.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      And finally if they did do that convoluted process to sideline a justice but delay the governor being able to appoint a successor I think the governor could very well rightfully interpret the situation as a vacancy on the court and appoint anyway.

      That would require a democrat to actually do something other that stand around an insist on the importance of decorum. It won’t happen.

  • ForestOrca@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Wisconsin GOP plan to overturn an election - FTFY. A lot of Wisconsonites are avidly, actively against this, it’s just that gerrymandering has diluted their vote.

  • kgbbot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everything about the impeachment plan is definitely a complete violation of each elected politician’s oath of officer and attempting to subvert the will of the voters should lead to every single representative who is endorsing this plan being permanently removed from office.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    If they impeach she might have grounds to invoke her right to a speedy trial. I know this is was originally meant for criminal cases but I think the principle stands that government shouldn’t be able to string you along forever, especially when your rights are curtailed and they have zero expectations of winning the case.

    • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If she is impeached and convicted Dem Gov. Evers can select her replacement, which can also include Protasiewicz. If she is impeached without conviction so that she’s permanently suspended, she can resign for the same outcome. If Protasiewicz (or someone else) is appointed they will serve a 1 year rather than 10 year term, but she won 55-44 in her last statewide election.

      With a Dem Gov and her 11 point advantage which would only grow if she were unfairly impeached, I think chances are still high that the Republican Legislature can only delay the inevitable, but there’s a lot still up in the air obviously.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cram it down their throats. Make it a campaign message that gets repeated every hour on the hour in the upcoming campaigns. There are more districts that are no longer Republican strongholds than people realize.

      • captcha [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Bruh did you forget the whole point of gerrymandering? Its literally rigging the voting system and your plan is to just vote with gerrymandering as a rallying cry. We’d be better off rallying around abortion rights. We’d be better off just rioting. I appreciate your rage about gerrymandering but thats something only primary voters give a shit about.

        There are more districts that are no longer Republican strongholds than people realize.

        The GOP is sitting at almost a 2/3rds supermajority in both houses. Which and how many districts do you think we can flip?