• MNByChoice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re like a serf going “Go move to a republic 🥶.”

    Wait, what? A serf cannot move without the king’s permission. You, I, and everyone can make it a preference to join a co-op or union work place with every job move.

    Are there many co-op positions available in my area and field? No. Unions? No.
    Do I have a preference for them? Yes.
    Maybe I will have to start one.

    One step at a time is better than no steps.

    • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, one step at a time is great. It’s just not a replacement for systemic change.

      If you can unionize or start a co-op, do it! Any amount of worker power will help the overall cause.

      • kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Systemic change requires state violence as you have to convince the benefactors of capitalism to give up their property and powe. The only way to accomplish this state violence is with a bureaucracy and concentration of power. Tada: You created Stalinism. Again. Just like the last 20 times socialism was tried by big picture “revolutions”

        I don’t think worker rebellions get you where you need, so come up with an alternate route.

    • chaalfont@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the issue would be that currently it is not feasible for workers to start co-ops. Subsidies for worker co-ops would be a good option