Privacy concerns are a very popular and valid talking point on Lemmy, so I would like to gather your thoughts and opinions on this. (Apologies if it’s already been discussed!)

Would you support this? Would it work or even be viable? (If it could somehow overcome the rabid resistance from these big companies). What are your thoughts?

Personally, I’m getting more and more agitated at the state of this late stage global capitalism, where companies have the gall to ask you to pay or subscribe to their products, while they already make money from you for selling your data. It’s been an issue for a long time now, but seems to really be ramping up.

  • gelberhut@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Generally, I personally, disagree. Usually companies do not get your data from the air, they provide people service and often for free in exchange. This is a model which made internet available for masses.

    What I agree with - a transparency and control, more or less like GDPR suggests (not like it is usually implemented, though).

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I feel like OP is suggested a world where you pay $5 a month to use Facebook, but you get the premium version for free if you sign off your rights. Maybe not a whole lot would change, except a higher awareness of the business model.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        OP wants companies pay them. Regarding pay or watch ad (this is a usual way your data is sold): youtube, spotify and many others offer this option already now.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imo companies should at least pay for the data used by said ads. Especially the ones that needlessly throw videos at people.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      regulations like transparency and user control only work when the ones with the data actually follow the laws.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everything works only when involved parties (all, not just with the data)follow the laws.

    • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of instances of companies collecting your data either without you knowing or without you knowing you can opt out of collection. There needs to be a set standard provided and adhered to in regards to collecting personal data.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree. And the actual attempt is called GDPR and CCo.

        However, one can put in other direction as well: similar “standards” and laws against people who try to use a service without paying for it neither watching ad nor paying money.

    • Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, if there’s a clear benefit to harvesting my data, like I don’t have to pay for the service then that’s fine. There should be clarity on what data is collected and how it’s used so I can decide if the benefits justify the cost.

      • ElleChaise@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good point, they shouldn’t just be allowed to say “we’re improving our product with ur info lol” and call it a day. How? Like our tax money in my country, I heard the Aussies get a breakdown of where the money is going. Where’s my breakdown? Where’s the breakdown for the techno spying? Lack of info seems to be the business model with both of these systems, lol.

      • kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a chain of reporting issue. Generally, the site you’re on (outside the social media shitholes) will keep track of some identifier of who you are, and which sites you visited. Then they will share your identifier with an advertising partner to deliver you advertisements. The advertising partner will take your data and pass it off to a data management platform (Hi Oracle!) who will then attempt to link you on that site to literally everything you have ever done. They have deals with Credit card companies, TV vendors, car manufacturers, cell service providers, public databases. That’s where the sketchiness happens. The worst part of it all is that realistically, the advertisers don’t care about all that data. They almost always want some very basic demographic data that fits in the old Nielsen family demographic data: It doesn’t make any sense to advertise a Lexus or investment advice to someone making minimum wage. Politicians want to know who likely voters are. Macy’s wants to advertise at people who shop at malls. They also want “Lives within 50 miles of my business”

        The biggest worry is that the data platforms collect a lot of exact data that is not used except for super suspect Cambridge Analytica level targeted political advertising, and to add to it: They are reallllllly crappy at their jobs. I work in AdTech, so I can poke around at what they think I am and I’ve had things from “Salad Dressing lover” to being both unemployed and making $1 million/year in the same profile.