So, I want to preface this by saying I do not write well. My thoughts rarely form paragraphs with beginnings, middles, and ends. I get off on tangents and forget my original point. Iām sure a lot of others here are similar, but this disclaimer is more for the neurotypical readers whom I am hoping will see this.
The tone of this entire post is honest and earnest unless otherwise specified.
Tone indicators get a lot of flak for being ācringeā in some circles, and Iām sad to have seen that that mindset apparently pervades here. Trying to put myself in the shoes of a NT person who does not understand the struggles of ND people, I can see why they might have that perspective. Tone indicators can seem unnecessary to someone who implicitly understands tone, and who assumes that itās a skill everyone has.
But not everyone has the skill to recognize and understand tone. In verbal dialogue some ND people may have had enough experience to build up a reference of what sarcastic or joking voices sound like and file those away for later use, but online there are no such indicators ā a problem that tone indicators attempt to fix.
So while to a NT reader a joke comment about, I donāt know, literally wanting to fuck my mom or something, might be immediately obvious, because āof courseā a person online from another continent who has never seen her before probably doesnāt want to fuck my mom, this is not always evident to ND people. Neurodiversity is classified as a disability (and while I acknowledge the push back against this idea as inherently ableist by many in the community, bear with me,) and for many of us, one of the abilities we may lack is one which NT people take for granted: the ability to parse tone. To some of us, that flippant joke someone made might be confusing, or hurtful.
And while I donāt expect everyone to indicate tone online all of the time, what I do think should be expected from users on Hexbear, as a space that strives to be inclusive and uplifting to marginalized groups, is that if they are asked to clarify tone, they should. And Iād like to thank the user who made a thread on that topic. This should be the absolute bare minimum.
Now, some of our NT readers might be thinking ābut I put a meme face image after my statement! It should make it obvious its tone!ā But I donāt think that is sufficient to indicate tone. Tone indicators are numerous, but the list is somewhat short. I know of: sarcastic, joking, half joking, honest, confused, and a few others. This is not much to memorize, and their meanings are easily looked up. Meme imagesā¦ not so much. There are hundreds here on Hexbear, many of which have no documentation like āmainstreamā^ā memes do, so their meanings can be even more confusing than your jokes.
So try to put yourself in the shoes of a ND person who has trouble with tone, especially online. They are trying to understand your joke and get in on the fun. They want to be a part of the group. Theyāre having a little trouble understanding, so they ask you to clarify. Do you want to be inclusive and simply clarify your tone, or do you want to continue to uphold the paradigm of ND exclusion that pervades other spaces?
Speaking of exclusionary spaces, this leads me to point two. Intent.
I have already had an experience here, and seen many other such moments, where someone immediately jumped to hostility when they didnāt understand another user. I understand that thatās just the way online life is now, but again, shouldnāt we be trying to be better?
When you read a comment here and immediately jump to the conclusion that a user is bad-faith and start to dress them down, consider that on the other side of the screen might be a ND person with a different communication style than you, or a user whose native language isnāt the same as yours^ā , who may have not communicated their thoughts in a way that best connected with you but who certainly doesnāt deserve to be immediately attacked over it.
ND people already have to put up with so much of this kind of thing in real life. Itās exhausting to be excluded or attacked for using language slightly differently, or for trying but failing to mimic our peers, or for talking about things in a āround about way,ā et cetera. When it happens in a space like this that purports to be inclusive, itās especially harmful.
Does it really harm you so much to ask a clarifying question to determine if you understood correctly before jumping to attacking a userās message? Thereās a good chance that there was a communication failure between you, and if so then 1) you stand to harm the other person needlessly by attacking them and 2) you waste energy breaking down an idea that was not even real ā it was merely your mistaken interpretation of what the idea was.
And speaking of attacks, letās move on to point three: slurs.
Ableism is so normalized in society that the vast majority of our personal attacks attempt to degrade someoneās intelligence or sanity in some way. Hereās a non-exhaustive list off the top of my head:
ableist terms
idiot, dumb, stupid, insane, crazy, lunatic, loon(e)y, nuts, āare you blind??ā, ādeaf to [an idea]ā, lame
Plenty of the terms on this list are alive and well on Hexbear. Please consider how you make ND comrades feel when you use these terms as attacks ā not just on ND comrades, but also on takes you think are bad in the Dunk Tank. These are terms a lot of us have been called all our lives. They carry a lot of pain. And by continuing to use them in the way you are, youāre upholding normalized ableism by equating neurodiversity with badness.
Theyāre not even good insults, very low effort. Liberals donāt inherently lack intelligence ā and even if they did this wouldnāt be what makes their takes bad. They are willfully ignorant, and itās the willfulness that makes it especially bad. People who are just ignorant have a chance to learn.
Speaking of ignorance and chances to learn, neurotypicals: this space is not actually as inclusive as you might think it is. I am calling you out on it. What are you going to do to get better?
ā Honestly, the assumption that everyone from everywhere in the world is going to understand your screenshots from western television shows kind of strikes me as a sort of western cultural hegemony anyway.
ā Oh wow thereās that anglosphere cultural hegemony again
āno investigation = no right to speakā
āwhat youāve typed does not make senseā
āthis is not based in material realityā
āwhat do you mean by this? it does not make senseā
āwhat a silly thing to sayā
āyou are a reactionary bigotā
āyour arguement has no meritā
āwhat youāve said is your feeling, and is devoid of fact. Facts donāt care about your feelingsā
Thanks comrade!