• TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing I dislike most about Atlassian products is that each of them has a completely different formatting engine and markup syntax. You’d think they’d be consistent but noooo

      • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        10 months ago

        Atlassian doesn’t even have consistency within single products! I’m using Jira Cloud at work, and while most fields support markdown (e.g. three backticks to start a code block) there are a few that only support Jira’s own notation (e.g. {code} to start a code block). It’s always infuriating when I type some markdown in one of the fields that doesn’t support it for some inexplicable reason.

        • sznio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Try to do any formatting more complex than none at all in Confluence. It just gets polluted with invisible markup and changes styling randomly.

        • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Both Bitbucket and Confluence partially support Markdown, but they implement it in different ways, which is maddening.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Jira Developers: for the love of god can we PLEASE stop trying to shoehorn literally fucking everything into our platform?

      Jira PMs: slaps roof this bad boy can fit so much scope creep