A federal judge has struck down a California law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. U.S.

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Jeremy [Iowa]English
    1·
    9 months ago

    I spend the time looking up a stat I have read before and the person I am talking to denies its validity for whatever reason. Here’s the first source I found.

    Have you considered following your “stats” and “sources” for quality inputs and sound reasoning, or perhaps making claims actually substantiated by those sources?

    You seem to be under the impression that any source is perfectly valid no matter what; that I can make up bullshit, slap it in a PDF on a WordPress cite, and complain when it rightly call it bullshit.

    Those are called action movies. Not reality.

    Except where your source directly calls out such an occurrence, right?

    I guarantee that if you got shot with a .22 you would be laying on the ground crying like a baby.

    … ironically, such a many-shot example used a large caliber.