• Shelenn Ayres@nerdica.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    @RecycledAnonymous Then there are tech and moderation issues, 1) How will they moderate and federate? 2) Admin to use ratio? 3) Community social director? 4) Contributing funding/code to Mastodon development? 5) Scale issues? 6) Funding/Monetization? 7) Code of Conduct? 8) Terms of Service? 9 Data privacy compliant? 10) DMCA compliance? 11) Support for Signal? 12) Account and content export?

    But I agree it is not useful if a user cannot specify their instance account.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Vivaldi social is moderated by the team (forum by volunteers), every federated instance has its own norm of conduct and moderators, Vivaldi also collaborate in the code and devs, monetiacion of Vivaldi don’t change (see Vivaldi business model), the TOS and PP is the same as in all Vivaldi services, no ads, no trackers, no sellings to third party companies, no Big Data companies, DMCA compilamce is these of an EU product (Vivaldi is an EU product, Iceland and Norway). The user can use the instance he want, Vivaldi only offers to the Vivaldi user a instance which he can use (or not) without the need to create a new account, this don’t exclude the use of other instances of the users choice.