• Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I will never understand this controversial stupidity, why people can not use what they want and this without having “prejudice”?

    • d_k_bo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing about Ubuntu and snaps is that they are pushing it and “forcing” its users to use it.

      You can uninstall it using sudo apt remove snapd but if you then try to install eg. firefox using sudo apt install firefox — voilà! — snapd is back.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure how they are forcing their users to use snaps any more than debian is forcing their users to use apt. It’s a package manager the distro is consciously supporting. If you don’t like snaps then you should probably just stop using Ubuntu.

        Yes, I agreeing that symlinking sunsetted apt packages to install the snap version without prior notification is a bit underhanded: I can see they want to make the switch easy for casual users, but the transparency isn’t there for advanced users. I still think it’s a fine distro for newer and casual users.

        • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People installed Ubuntu ages ago without snap. They were perfectly happy with that decision until Canonical decided to shove snap down their throats leaving them with three choices:

          • accept snaps
          • remove snaps painstakingly from your system entirely (Windows and Telemetry equivalent)
          • switch distro

          There is a very clear divide between work needed to achieve these options so saying that snaps are forced on users is fair to say imo. For an example how it should be done: Fedora ships with Flatpak support but I can chose if I want to install Firefox as a Flatpak or a RPM package.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every distro decides what features to introduce and when. Distros and DEs are making the choice when to implement new standards like Wayland and Pipewire, GNOME shifts its features over time and in the latest release is redesigning how its window management workflow is going to work. When you choose a distro and DE, you’re choosing to trust them with these decisions. That doesn’t mean users are “forced.” Users can and will vote with their feet.

            Ubuntu introduced snaps in 16.04, and has been gradually increasing their presence since then. Users have had 7 years to decide they don’t like them and change distros.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The comic is depicting someone who doesn’t want to use snaps then being upset when they run into snaps after choosing a disto that is known for snaps. The comic is not making fun of people who like or dislike snaps, it’s making fun of people who dislike snaps but then choose to use a disto with snaps.