@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square169fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square169fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year agoDuckDuckGo is just Bing.
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·1 year agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
minus-squareTick_Dracy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoDDG is a search engine without its own search engine.
DuckDuckGo is just Bing.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Removed by mod
DDG is a search engine without its own search engine.