@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoreminderlemmy.worldimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up11.76Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.75Karrow-down1imagereminderlemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.worldM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square190fedilink
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoWhy should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoAre you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense? First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoLol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoSo you gonna spot me the $40?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoWhy would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient? Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoThe study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year ago Have you never heard of Sci-Hub or other services to circumvent such paywalls? As I said, more than enough people have made such studies. You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.
Why should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
Like who?
Are you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense?
First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
So you gonna spot me the $40?
Why would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient?
Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
The study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.