ZeroCool@feddit.ch to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago100% Chancei.postimg.ccimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1669arrow-down124file-text
arrow-up1645arrow-down1image100% Chancei.postimg.ccZeroCool@feddit.ch to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-text
Link to the original article: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-17/forecast-for-us-recession-within-year-hits-100-in-blow-to-biden
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago OP has no idea who NBER was And what evidence has led you to believe that… Oh yeah, another assumption! Do context clues exist in your first language? Lol, do logical fallacies exist in your first language?
minus-squarePeaty@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAssumptions are not logical fallacies. Deriving info from context is not either.
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe logical fallacies happened when you utilized your assumptions to validate your claim, not when you made an assumption.
minus-squarePeaty@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat isn’t a fallacy either. If they knew about the NBER or not “they” did not change the definition. The definition they thought was correct is an oversimplification and was not correct.
And what evidence has led you to believe that… Oh yeah, another assumption!
Lol, do logical fallacies exist in your first language?
Assumptions are not logical fallacies. Deriving info from context is not either.
The logical fallacies happened when you utilized your assumptions to validate your claim, not when you made an assumption.
That isn’t a fallacy either. If they knew about the NBER or not “they” did not change the definition. The definition they thought was correct is an oversimplification and was not correct.