• ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The issue is that you can’t detect photons without interacting with them.

    Can’t…So far, right? Like there hasn’t been a method developed to somehow detect indirectly without interaction? I don’t know enough about this to know how one might go about that, but I imagine those that know more might love to given whatever knowledge may be gained.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. Can’t. The only interaction sensors have is with particles. Photons usually. All things give off light but then measuring light itself, measuring is destructive.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Detecting” equals “interaction” in this context. You can’t detect them without detecting them.

      • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Although, given some further thought, isn’t the double-slit experiment being discussed here sort of demonstrative of a “detection” without detection, i.e. the wave pattern vs. the particle pattern emerging after “detection/measurement/interaction”? Or am I misunderstanding it?

        Is there another way they operate/appear outside of the wave-particle that eludes observation?