InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoMap of real cities in Americahexbear.netimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1145arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1145arrow-down1imageMap of real cities in Americahexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarestolid_agnostic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 year agoSurprised not to see San Francisco at 30%+. It’s got a great transit system with very high utilization, though maybe it’s regions rather than cities that are analyzed here.
minus-squarezephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoCalling BART and Caltrain “great” is a bit of a stretch.
minus-squareMardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoEven compared to the system in, say, Sydney, it sucks. Heck, it sucks compared to Auckland’s famously bad public transit.
minus-squareGaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoMap says metro area so it has to include North and East Bay there
Surprised not to see San Francisco at 30%+. It’s got a great transit system with very high utilization, though maybe it’s regions rather than cities that are analyzed here.
Calling BART and Caltrain “great” is a bit of a stretch.
Even compared to the system in, say, Sydney, it sucks. Heck, it sucks compared to Auckland’s famously bad public transit.
Map says metro area so it has to include North and East Bay there