Speaking from the Oval Office starting at 8 p.m. ET, Biden made the case to Americans that it’s vital to both global and U.S. national security to assist Israel as it responds to terror attacks by Hamas as well as to continue help for Ukraine as it fends off Russian invaders.

“Hamas and Putin represent different threads but they share this in common: They both want to completely annihilate a neighboring democracy,” Biden said, referring to the extremists and Russia’s president.

Biden said he knows the conflicts can seem distant and Americans might be asking why it’s vital to U.S. security interests that Israel and Ukraine succeed.

“History has taught us that when terrorists don’t pay a price for their terror, when dictators don’t pay a price for their aggression, they cause more chaos and debt and more destruction,” Biden said. “They keep going – and the cost and the threats to America and the world keep rising.”

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden siding with Israel is going to cost him the presidency. There’s no way that this situation will be resolved by next November and Israel support is massively unpopular in the left.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As awful as this is, I believe that Trump would be even worse, for both the country and the entire world. If it comes down to Biden and Trump, I’ll still vote for Biden… but not with much enthusiasm.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You think anyone at all who was planning to vote Biden will change their mind (and choose Trump over him) due to this?

      Really?

      Who?

      • Vash63@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t need to. They just need to not vote. Low turnout is what swings elections to the right.

        • morphballganon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You think this will compel people who were planning to vote Biden to not vote?

          I personally find that idea laughable. Anyone who is so easy to swing doesn’t give a shit about Israel.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            A significant percentage of people don’t even make up their mind on who to vote for until the election day. It’s absurd. With a margin that can determine the winner by 2% of the population changing their mind, our nation’s future is decided by people the day of that felt more strongly about what they wanted for breakfast than who they wanted for president.

            The margins are close enough in battleground states that they can easily be swung by people thinking “ah, fuck it. They both suck” and not going to the polls.

            The idea is laughable. It’s true though.

            • Jeremy [Iowa]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The margins are close enough in battleground states that they can easily be swung by people thinking “ah, fuck it. They both suck” and not going to the polls.

              If only there were something a given party could do to overcome voter apathy… some way they could attract that third of the voter-base that abstains rather that depending on a razor-thin margin made up of already-likely-to-vote partisan diehards…

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel is even more popular on the right, he’s more likely to lose by NOT supporting Israel. The Republicans would have a field day if there was any hint that he wasn’t supporting Israel 100%. You know they’d have Bibi in front of Congress the next day calling for more Republicans to be elected.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        How has he apologized for their war crimes? That’s not what I’ve heard him say at all

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you implying that Trump (or any conservative) wouldn’t also bend over backwards to Netanyahu? The US is an Israeli puppet state

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d wager they’re implying a “never Biden” stance is basically a vote for Trump in a contest between the two. In reality, Biden has clearly told Israel to restrain themselves and gotten them to agree to allow in humanitarian aid, whereas Trump would have them carpet-bombing Gaza

            • takeda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Exactly, he was the one who moved US embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing it as capital of Israel, even though he was advised to not do it.

              He also claims he killed Soleimani (nearly starting war with Iran) because Nethanyahu asked him. Of course Nethanyahu won’t admit it so we don’t know, but I tend to think it probably is true as he would never give anyone credit, and claiming that doesn’t save him.

              Every policy he did in his 4 years was pro Israel. Things he didn’t need to do and only were stirring the pot.

              Now he magically supposedly supports Palestinians, calling Hezbollah smart. Interestingly when there seems to be similar position in Kremlin.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I am implying that your other choice is Trump, which is infinitely worse. So, not voting for Biden is giving one vote for Trump.

            • Jeremy [Iowa]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So, not voting for Biden is giving one vote for Trump.

              Could you help me understand how the failure to increment one sum is somehow the active incrementing of another sum?

              If Candidate A has one apple and Candidate B has one apple, I’m having a hard time seeing how choosing to not give either candidate an apple somehow results in either one gaining their second apple. I could use a walk-through of that one.

        • Jeremy [Iowa]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see we’re still pretending those are the only two options.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless you have ranked choice voting where you are, they are the only two options. Voting for a 3rd party in most of the US is the same thing as just not voting for whichever of the two main candidates you prefer against the other.

            • Jeremy [Iowa]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unless you have ranked choice voting where you are, they are the only two options.

              I wasn’t aware the presence of ranked-choice voting somehow gated the presence of other parties or candidates on a given ballot, let alone one’s ability to simply choose to abstain. You’ll have to explain that one for me as it seems indistinguishable from magic.

              Voting for a 3rd party in most of the US is the same thing as just not voting for whichever of the two main candidates you prefer against the other.

              It’s interesting that you highlight two other potential options immediately after asserting these options simply don’t exist.

              It’s similarly interesting you seem to equate choosing to not vote with actively indicating which candidate best represents your interests; you seem to pretend there is in every scenario an establishment candidate one would prefer. Have you considered the entire reason for the existence of parties outside the establishment duo is a stark departure from the values of those parties?

    • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually doubtful. A voter that doesn’t agree with the current level of support, would then vote for an (arguably worse in other aspects) alternative, which… will establish a higher level of support?

      Sounds like your hypothetical voter might just choose to take more than one geopolitical issue into account when deciding the future for themselves, their family and fellow citizens.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know. I get the feeling that it’s massively unpopular in the circles people like you and I run in, but the average left-leaning voter is still pretty well conditioned to think Israel=good Palestine=bad. It’s definitely not great and the Biden camp is surely not thrilled to have to deal with it but I don’t think it’ll hurt them too much.

      I hope so anyway, because if Biden does lose the presidency we’ll end up with someone who would be fine with just nuking Gaza.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve honestly been baffled by how the left has suddenly latched on to Palestinian support and Israeli hatred. I’m pretty far left and my stance is that both sides are wrong. Supporting one or the other is unhelpful and you are supporting a war criminal government/organization whichever you choose.

      Support the people. Give aid where it is needed. Help to eliminate the violent elements.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one supports Hamas. The left support is for the Palestinians. While the asks for Israeli support are for the governments current plans and actions.

        Hamas’s attack is a horror committed by a terrorist organization that we have no real influence over or responsibility for, and which is basically over, while the other is an ongoing war crime, with little signs of slowing, being perpetrated by a US ally. To some extent our tax dollars paid for the military that’s killing civilians and our support allows them to keep going despite international condemnation. If Israel chose to or if sufficient international pressure were brought to bear, they could not murder any more people. More innocent people die the more strongly the US supports Israel while condemnations of Hamas do nothing other than confirm evil people are bad.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actual leftists in the US don’t vote so their support doesn’t really matter.

      Support for Israel is extremely popular with liberals, moderates, and conservatives. It’ll solidify support among the liberals that do vote, take away a swing issue for moderates, and probably help swing some anti Trump conservatives to him.

    • deconstruct@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope.

      In Quinnipiac’s latest poll, 48% of Democratic voters say their sympathies are more with Israelis compared to 22% who said Palestinians. That’s a massive change from the 46% for Palestinians and 23% for Israelis in May 2021. Fox’s poll, likewise, has shown support for Israel up by 17 points among Democrats compared to 2021.

    • donuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      siding with Israel

      Siding with Israel over… Hamas?

      Personally I don’t find that to be very controversial at all, as Hamas aren’t exactly angels. You’d have to have the memory of a goldfish to forget that Hamas just led a mass terrorist attack (if you consider Hamas a legitimate military force, which I do not, then please substitute “terrorist attack” with “war crimes campaign”) against Israeli civilians including old women and young children.

      To state what should be obvious to everyone, you don’t have to be pro-Hamas to feel empathy for innocent Palestinians. I feel that Biden’s actions and rhetoric have been reasonable and measured on this extremely complex and highly volatile conflict.

      • DrPop@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We also don’t know the full extent of the talks between Biden and Netenyahu. All we can do is try and teach our to our representatives.