• BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Housing is just a pump that transfers money from the bottom to the top. THE COST OF HOUSING USED TO BE 3 ANNUAL SALARIES. We could also turn air into a similar pump but air is more difficult to fence off…

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      When my wife and I started looking at buying a house, there were new houses in a brand new development going for absolutely screaming deals. Houses twice the size of similarly priced houses. They were bland, soulless husks, each one bordering on ugly. You could even just buy the land and build your own home, ordered from a catalog. No estimate on time, of course.

      And nestled in to the fine print at every single one, an HOA. The worst being 400+ dollars a month.

      New housing isn’t being built, at least not for most Americans. We’re above average earners in a low cost of living area. What we can afford is not typical, and these crappy catalog mcmansions were just at the top of our price range, before the HOA.

      The only solution I see to the housing problem, is mandating that middle-low income housing be built. Right now there’s no incentive to. The money is in keeping it scarce, or milking a covenant.

        • nerin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Home owner’s association. Neighborhoods have common needs such as landscaping and other infrastructure that doesn’t fall in someone’s property. In theory these make sense, you have a group of people who set guidelines to keep the neighborhood nice. However, what often ends up happening is the group pushes their own agendas and it is no longer for the common good.

          • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            To elaborate for the curious, basically a community sets up a committee that will handle these things. You would normally pay HOA fees to cover things like paying for the streetlights in a private community, the pool or fitness center, or whatever a long those lines. Basically for a private community it’s a way to say “Hey, we need some things done to keep things nice, everyone pay in so the flowers look good this year”. Normally, not a bad idea. There are usually two things that go wrong though. One, the money is mismanaged and/or people are heavily overcharged and the extra money disappears. The other is that HOAs also have rules for the community to keep things orderly on their own property. No cars in your yard, no blaring music after 9pm, etc. But you hear about a lot of cases where this stuff gets out of hand and suddenly people are getting fined for having trash cans out too long or the wrong colored curtains.

            Because of this, people have justifiably built up a lot of hate for HOAs. Imagine buying a house, your own property, then paying +$100 a month to keep the neighborhood nice, then some picky Karen comes by to tell you that you can’t hang up your sports team flag and if you don’t take it down they’ll fine you $50 a day.

            • rekliner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s worse than the just Karens. If you don’t pay the fines they will put a lien on your property and eventually evict you. This has created a strong market pressure towards swindling people out of their places. Financial groups that manage HOAs wholesale are now the norm and they love encouraging Karens to generate nonsense rules and report offenders… They get a cut of either the fine or the home sale sand get to play the role faceless enforcer. There are no regulations on how high fines can go, nor how high LATE FEES on those fines can go, nor how soon “late” is.

              We are way past the time when HOAs were harmless funny people hyperfocusing on lawns… It’s a predatory business now.

          • neomachino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            My wife was telling me a story about her friends friend, who lives in an HOA neighborhood and had a big tree that was rotting in their yard and was causing concern about it falling over. Apparently they went to the hoa for approval to cut it down and they said no for one reason or another, then started fining them for it. Then a while after they collected a good deal of money off the fines said they could cut it down but they had to use a specific company who happened to be owned by a relative of the head of the hoa and charged them a lot more than they should have.

            This story was passed down the lane and I don’t even know the couple, but it doesn’t sound far fetched.

        • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Additionally, they set rules about really nitpicky things like house paint color, mail box standardization, how often you mow and water your lawn, what kind of holiday decorations you can have and when they can be up, whether you store your trash cans in a way that is visible from the street when it’s not collection day, guests parking on the street too often, that kind of thing. They can fine or even kick you out of your house for violations.

          What is a group of Karens called?

          A homeowners association.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your proposed solution is too narrow. All housing makes housing more affordable. Just let developers actually build the places people are demanding, whatever they are. No housing you build will ever be affordable unless there is enough of it.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I see your point, and I don’t disagree. But we’re currently allowing developers to pick and choose which housing to focus on, and so the only housing being built is the housing with the most to profit from, the higher end housing.

          I say mandate middle and lower income housing because it’s not being built, leaving a growing population to scramble for a decreasing supply of units.

          Mixed use buildings and neighborhoods are also disappearing, and mixed use buildings are going to be key in the future.