The 190-year-old whisky is expected to sell for over $12,000 a bottle. Here are all the details on the liquid, including how you can get your hands on some of it.

Late last year, a hidden trove of whisky was discovered in a cellar room deep within a 13th century Scottish castle. The liquid was subsequently tested and determined to have been distilled back in 1833, making it the oldest known scotch in existence. Now two dozen bottles of it are going under the hammer in a November auction.

    • Destide@feddit.ukEnglish
      44·
      1 year ago

      Hey it’s your boy tik-tok Keith I just brought this Whiskey, and we’re going to pour it down the sink

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        17·
        1 year ago

        Scotch 1/4 as old as me costs $50. Scotch nearly half as old as me costs $250. Scotch as old as me costs $35k. Following that progression to four times as old as me suggests those bottles will command a sum that could change the course of human history by eliminating hunger or curing diseases or colonizing Mars.

        • SARGEx117@lemmy.world
          162·
          1 year ago

          Reminder thay humanity has the power to end global hunger with both food resources and excess money to transport it.

          We just choose not too because it’s “too hard” and “too expensive”

          Just don’t ask who we, as humanity, owe the money to because you won’t like the answer. It certainly isn’t some galactic bank telling us we don’t qualify for a loan…

          • Jakdracula@lemmy.world
            63·
            1 year ago

            Under capitalism, food isn’t produced to eat but to make profits. When it’s not profitable to sell, they will rather dump foods, starving the people rather than to plainly donate. We produce enough foods to feed the entire population. But the sole purpose of food is to not feed the people, but to feed the greed of the producers, the farmers, the corporates. Capitalism created an artificial scarcity of food where we produce too much food for the obese and throw the rest away to rot in front of the poor.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          5·
          1 year ago

          It’s just a transfer of money, not expenditure of resources. The money doesn’t disappear when whoever owns the scotch gets it. Wasting natural resources and labor is much different and worse.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            1·
            1 year ago

            My mistake. I skimmed it and got excited and thought they found forgotten casks, not already bottled Scotch. Since it’s not a known label, I’m not sure collectors will care all that much. And it’s probably not going to drink all that well as 8 years is on the younger side for Scotch. Depending on how well it was bottled, it might not be drinkable at all.

            I’m sure someone will pay for the novelty, but this is way less exciting than I thought.