This sub is pointless until it can provide a solution to having to get somewhere 30 miles from here when it’s 10 below outside for most of the winter.
Dont give me that it’s not always 10 below excuse. It is often 10 below or lower for long stretches in the north. Biking is simply not viable or practical.
Look at this example. Looks like it’s 80 and sunny with the top down on a convertible and everyone in summer clothes.
Public transport? Or cars. Some people on here may be militant about getting rid of all cars, but most of us aren’t that extreme. We simply want to have the option to not use cars, which is currently not the case in many regions of the world.
Talking about the problem is literally the only way to further the cause. Change starts with a dialog. We’re not going to “get the laws passed and THEN talk about it”, that’s backwards.
80% of the US lives in metropolitan and micropolitan areas. In small towns, suburbs and cities.
People on this sub aren’t saying that we should force Old Macdonald to take the bus from the farm to the feed store. You’re never going to get rid of all cars. They have an important niche.
You always have the option to not use a car if weather permits no one is stopping you.
I mean, in a technical sense that’s true. Practically, though, people respond to their built environment. There’s a reason way more people drive to work in Rome than Barcelona, and it ain’t the weather. And there’s a reason way more people bike in the winter in Oulu, Finland than Syracuse, NY despite having similar populations and climate.
Most people aren’t ideological “drivers” or “pedestrians”, they’re just people who want to get somewhere and will follow the path of least resistance. Put them in Amsterdam and they’ll happily bike to their destination, put them in Houston and they wouldn’t.
Dont give me that it’s not always 10 below excuse. It is often 10 below or lower for long stretches in the north. Biking is simply not viable or practical.
“It’s sometimes cold, therefore you can never bike”
This sub is pointless until it can provide a solution to having to get somewhere 30 miles from here when it’s 10 below outside for most of the winter.
-10F or -10C?
-10C really isn’t very cold. The average low in Oulu, Finland in February is -12C, and ~10% of all trips there in the winter are via bike because they have an extensive network of well-plowed bike paths.
Biking in -10C is really just a matter of having appropriate gear to block the wind - similar to what you’d wear skiing like a jacket, mittens and a neck gator/ski mask. -10C isn’t warm, but people do outdoor winter sports literally all the time in -10C. It’s fine.
-10F needs better cold gear, and is probably going to be pretty uncomfortable for most people. You definitely have to worry about preventing frostbite, and I definitely know skiers who would stay inside.
But most places don’t really stay -10F. That’s like Fargo or Fairbanks cold, not Buffalo or Boston cold. Chicago has only gotten down to -10F in three years in the past decade. Relatively few people live in places that regularly stay -10F.
Although there’s a standard solution for 30 mile trips that works in basically all temperatures: a bus or train. Which isn’t really practical in American style suburban sprawl, but is very practical in denser walkable European towns and cities.
I dig the image, but as gators are cold-blooded, they’re probably not the best choice of neckwear in the winter. At least they will be too sluggish to bite.
But seriously, I’ve biked places in -10°F temperatures, one time wearing my down parka. Bad move! It was much, much too warm, and I arrived drenched in sweat. It’s actually better to layer up, because you can shed layers to manage your temperature. You start cold, but warm up rapidly, as biking is exercise, after all.
Goddamn right! But not correct enough. Cars are pointless until they can provide a solution to the need to move 40,000lbs of freight 3,500 miles! That’s why I drive a semi and trailer everywhere, even to the grocery store 6 blocks away.
Don’t give me some lame excuse about how the destination isn’t always 3,500 miles away, or the load that big. That’s just a cover for how your pathetic, little model F truck ain’t cutting it. That POS ain’t even got a sleeper unit! The only way to be a real man is to be ready for some OTR action at all times.
If we assume there isn’t another solution to that, why does it matter? Why does your need for a car for your specific use negate any use of alternatives anywhere? We can still advocate for better transportation and land use in cities, even if the proposed solution doesn’t work for your journey between Plunkett and Blucher.
This sub is pointless until it can provide a solution to having to get somewhere 30 miles from here when it’s 10 below outside for most of the winter.
Dont give me that it’s not always 10 below excuse. It is often 10 below or lower for long stretches in the north. Biking is simply not viable or practical.
Look at this example. Looks like it’s 80 and sunny with the top down on a convertible and everyone in summer clothes.
Everyone doesn’t live in Arizona, kar Karen.
Chill. We are working on the temperature. It just takes time, but I think we got one or two degrees already
Public transport? Or cars. Some people on here may be militant about getting rid of all cars, but most of us aren’t that extreme. We simply want to have the option to not use cars, which is currently not the case in many regions of the world.
There is no public transport that is even remotely able to serve the rural population.
You always have the option to not use a car if weather permits no one is stopping you. Your last statement is simply not true.
deleted by creator
Local city councils and state reps you vote for make those laws and rules. Get it funded then we’ll talk.
Convincing people to vote to get it funded is literally the point of posts like this. It’s called grassroots outreach.
It’s a fucking meme. Not a campaign. Get a clue.
This does nothing to further the cause.
Talking about the problem is literally the only way to further the cause. Change starts with a dialog. We’re not going to “get the laws passed and THEN talk about it”, that’s backwards.
deleted by creator
Only 20% of the US is rural.
80% of the US lives in metropolitan and micropolitan areas. In small towns, suburbs and cities.
People on this sub aren’t saying that we should force Old Macdonald to take the bus from the farm to the feed store. You’re never going to get rid of all cars. They have an important niche.
I mean, in a technical sense that’s true. Practically, though, people respond to their built environment. There’s a reason way more people drive to work in Rome than Barcelona, and it ain’t the weather. And there’s a reason way more people bike in the winter in Oulu, Finland than Syracuse, NY despite having similar populations and climate.
Most people aren’t ideological “drivers” or “pedestrians”, they’re just people who want to get somewhere and will follow the path of least resistance. Put them in Amsterdam and they’ll happily bike to their destination, put them in Houston and they wouldn’t.
“It’s sometimes cold, therefore you can never bike”
Solid take there.
10 below it not biking 30.miles to work either there, hero .
What a clown u are.
The only clown here is you, and the ratio confirms it. Take the L and leave
Ratio in an anti car sub? Lmfao. Confirmation bias much, there clown?
🤡
-10F or -10C?
-10C really isn’t very cold. The average low in Oulu, Finland in February is -12C, and ~10% of all trips there in the winter are via bike because they have an extensive network of well-plowed bike paths.
Biking in -10C is really just a matter of having appropriate gear to block the wind - similar to what you’d wear skiing like a jacket, mittens and a neck gator/ski mask. -10C isn’t warm, but people do outdoor winter sports literally all the time in -10C. It’s fine.
-10F needs better cold gear, and is probably going to be pretty uncomfortable for most people. You definitely have to worry about preventing frostbite, and I definitely know skiers who would stay inside.
But most places don’t really stay -10F. That’s like Fargo or Fairbanks cold, not Buffalo or Boston cold. Chicago has only gotten down to -10F in three years in the past decade. Relatively few people live in places that regularly stay -10F.
Although there’s a standard solution for 30 mile trips that works in basically all temperatures: a bus or train. Which isn’t really practical in American style suburban sprawl, but is very practical in denser walkable European towns and cities.
I dig the image, but as gators are cold-blooded, they’re probably not the best choice of neckwear in the winter. At least they will be too sluggish to bite.
But seriously, I’ve biked places in -10°F temperatures, one time wearing my down parka. Bad move! It was much, much too warm, and I arrived drenched in sweat. It’s actually better to layer up, because you can shed layers to manage your temperature. You start cold, but warm up rapidly, as biking is exercise, after all.
-10 degrees Celsius is about 14 degrees fahrenheit, which by all measures is still fucking cold to human beings.
Edit: missed the -
https://piped.araozu.dev/watch?v=xB1tgkOM6Bw&t=0
Goddamn right! But not correct enough. Cars are pointless until they can provide a solution to the need to move 40,000lbs of freight 3,500 miles! That’s why I drive a semi and trailer everywhere, even to the grocery store 6 blocks away.
Don’t give me some lame excuse about how the destination isn’t always 3,500 miles away, or the load that big. That’s just a cover for how your pathetic, little model F truck ain’t cutting it. That POS ain’t even got a sleeper unit! The only way to be a real man is to be ready for some OTR action at all times.
AT 👏ALL👏 TIMES👏.
If we assume there isn’t another solution to that, why does it matter? Why does your need for a car for your specific use negate any use of alternatives anywhere? We can still advocate for better transportation and land use in cities, even if the proposed solution doesn’t work for your journey between Plunkett and Blucher.