The Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey won't teach you this in Drivers Edstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down187
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThey won't teach you this in Drivers Edstartrek.websiteThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squareDa_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIn an automatic car. It’s a good way to do a burn out provided the engine has enough torque and the breaking is biased to the front.
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year ago and the breaking is biased to the front. What does that mean, the front falls off?
minus-squareDa_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoNope, jus that the front breaks have more breaking force than the rear. The power from the engine will overwhelm the rear breaks, so for a standing burnout you need the strong front breaks to not get overwhelmed.
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOh my, stop it… now the rear can also catch fire?! 🤣 just in case... brakes != breaks https://youtu.be/3m5qxZm_JqM?si=EsfrEZRoAQwPed6Y
In an automatic car. It’s a good way to do a burn out provided the engine has enough torque and the breaking is biased to the front.
What does that mean, the front falls off?
Nope, jus that the front breaks have more breaking force than the rear. The power from the engine will overwhelm the rear breaks, so for a standing burnout you need the strong front breaks to not get overwhelmed.
Oh my, stop it… now the rear can also catch fire?! 🤣
just in case...