• GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DM: The enemy champion approaches. He is eight feet tall, fully armored, and a seasoned warrior.

    David: I select my sling.

    DM: Okay, so that does 1d4 bludgeoning damage–

    David: Hang on, let me tell you about all my buffs and saved up Holy Favor points…

    DM: -___-

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A real sling shoots those pebbles like a bullet. If they hit (a non armored spot), it’d surely do more damage than an arrow.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a badass scene in the book This Immortal where a guy kills another guy with a sling.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Slingers were a separate set of ranged troops for the roman armies.

          I can’t recall precisely where I read it but what made slingers so deadly was their capacity to aim with precision on very small targets, unlike archers that would generally send arrow volleys in almost a suppression fire mode. A slinger could aim for the head, arms, eyes or joints for cripling or even deadly hits.

          Slingers often used lead to create “bullets” by just smelting it over a camp fire, making holes on a patch of sand with the tip of a finger, and pouring the molten metal in. A volley of these small, extremely dense but compact and deadly projectiles would wreck havoc on enemy lines or could be used to target commanders to break the chain of command and demoralize troops.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            How in the world was a sling more accurate than a bow? You can hit a bullseye with a barebow from 50 yards away. A sling is whirled around your head and then released. I don’t understand how that can be accurate at all, since I’ve never used a sling, but it seems impossible that it would be more accurate than a bow.

            • reeen@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              A basic sling should be very consistent and simple. Early bows have a lot of advantages but the mechanical complexity makes them less consistent. 50cm of rope is 50cm of rope, it’s gonna throw the same every time as long as you’re practiced. Bows are made of natural wood and fibre with all kinds of tensions and inconsistencies, as well as requiring more work to repeat the same action precisely

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                You still get two-handed control over the plane the arrow takes (before drift) and it’s easy to dial in angle and draw length. A sling bullet leaves tangent to a circle spinning at considerable speed and distance. The fact anyone can hit anything with a sling is a testament to the human brain’s that-looks-about-right capability to treat tools as extended limbs.

                • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The same for the bow, when considering we only figured the archer’s paradox already in the XX century and demonstrated it when high speed cameras were develope.

                  A sling shoots forward in a straight line and it only depends on the thrower to give it centripetal force.

                  Slings are still used today as weapons and effectively. And hunting with one, particularly birds, is an extremely complex exercise.

                • reeen@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That last sentence pretty much gets it perfectly

                  I think slings are treated similarly to throwing by the brain, which humans do very well

  • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 year ago

    I lost it at “ELISHA YES!”

    On a related note, I once read a nice DnD-esque summary of why Jesus was a Lich - that would fit right into this collection. (not my own pic or theory, just something I stole from imgur … still sorry for the missing pixels)

  • torknorggren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously though, why did Jesus curse that fig tree? He could be weirdly petty.

    BTW, myrrh had lots of uses besides embalming.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always understood it to be that things exist to be fruitful and multiply. In a sense, a person who does not love, who doesn’t multiply goodness in the world as Jesus modeled, was like the fig tree. Such things could be thought of as cursed, withered and twisted versions of what they could and should be.

      I am not a Bible scholar though lol.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        So it could be explained that Jesus is a carpenter but not a gardener, and a gardener just look at Jesus and wondering why the heck an adult would curse a fig tree.

      • d20bard@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty much, only detail missing is that it was the season for fruit. So, there is an added sense that by all natural laws the tree should have had fruit and it’s lack was a particular aberration to a societythat used the fig so much.

        Also, thematically, it rounds out God’s domains. Up to this point, there had been miracles showing dominion over weather, matter, human life, animal life, spirits, disease and now there’s plant life.

        • Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except that the gospel of Mark specifically states that it wasn’t fig season. Why did Jesus even look for the figs when he should have known they were out of season. Why then curse the tree when it was just doing what fig trees are supposed to do? Guess Jesus can be an ass when he’s hangry.

    • evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw a guy waving a sign to spread awareness, “God Hates Figs”

      Or something like that

    • jameseb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The understanding I’ve generally heard, and which seems supported by the context, is that the fig tree symbolises the unfruitfulness of God’s people. This is particularly apparent in that both Matthew and Mark record it as happening alongside Jesus casting out people trading in the temple (Luke records the cleansing of the temple but not the fig tree thing). It is then followed by Jesus telling a series of parables against the religious leaders. There may also be a relation to the parable of the barren fig tree earlier on in Luke 13.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Possibly an extremely contemporary metaphor, where the first-century audience was expected to recognize it as reference to a specific authority figure.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I too think this story is very confusing. I think it’s a metaphor saying something like the time / the people aren’t ready for him yet or something

    • Stamets@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Startrek.Website has been a bit sluggish the past day or so. Not super surprised the bigger images are taking a hot second to filter through. Sorry!

  • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cute. I’m genuinely unfamiliar with the story of Solomon and the demon. I’d be interested to hear the story behind that.

    • PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Everytime someone posts a really long image it’s heavily pixelated, and I thought it was just a me issue.

      Edit: turns out you need to change your ap options to load HQ image. Works now

      • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I recently learned that most of the aps people use for lemmy don’t do formatting correctly. The these words look like they have a strike through on whichever ap you are using, let the developer know that ~word~ should be subscript, and that ~~word~~ is strike through.

    • Ispanicus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you go into the post and open the picture it opens in good quality. There’s an issue with previews not loading properly sometimes.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Less “you botched your persuasion rolls,” more “I set the DC to 50 and we don’t do critical skill checks at this table”